Pegasus QUANTUM accident near Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, August 9, 2017
On August 9, 2017 at about 1:05 am local time, a 2007 Pegasus QUANTUM (weight-shift aircraft), registered N56092, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin (Fort Atkinson Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The student pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during a go-around, which resulted in impact with water. Contributing to the accident was the non-instructor sport pilot's decision to allow the student pilot to fly the aircraft.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- August 9, 2017 · about 1:05 am local time
- Place
- Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin · Fort Atkinson Muni · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Pegasus QUANTUM Q-2, built 2007
- Registration
- N56092 · no longer on the register · serial 173671
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The sport pilot (who was not an instructor) and the student-pilot-rated passenger were making a local personal flight in the weight-shift-control (WSC) aircraft. The pilot was seated in the front seat, and the passenger was seated in the rear seat. A flight instructor observed the WSC aircraft make several stable visual approaches to a grass runway. The last approach was unstable, which the flight instructor attributed to the passenger attempting to fly the approach. A go-around was initiated, which transitioned to a diving left turn that continued to impact with a river. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The aircraft's two "training bars," which were designed for use by a flight instructor flying from the rear seat, were each deformed to the left, consistent with the passenger gripping them as the aircraft impacted the river. The passenger had recently accomplished a solo flight in a fixed-wing airplane, which has reverse control inputs from a WSC aircraft. The passenger likely made incorrect control inputs during the go-around, due to negative transfer of learning from his fixed-wing airplane training. Because of the position of the training bars, the front-seat pilot would have been unable to see the inputs being made by the person in the rear seat. Although toxicological testing indicated that the pilot had used diphenhydramine at some point before the accident, the blood levels of this drug can change postmortem, and the pilot's blood levels at the time of the accident may have been significantly lower than the therapeutic range. Based on the accident scenario and available information, the pilot's use of diphenhydramine most likely did not contribute to the accident.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR go-around) defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
The NTSB's findings
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Lateral/bank control › Not attained/maintained
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot
- factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: sport pilot
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 400 hours in all; 400 in this make and model
- Last flight review: April 23, 2017
- Medical certificate: None
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
Dual student
- Certificate: student
- Flight time: 20 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Maximum gross weight: 858 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rotax 912 (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: 61C Fort Atkinson WI
- Destination: 61C Fort Atkinson WI
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 230° at 3 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 59°F (15°C)
- Altimeter: 30.12 inHg
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
6 documents, released by the NTSB on September 6, 2018. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overhead View of Flightpath - Witness Perspective | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 2 | FAA Inspector Statement | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Exam Notes and Witness Perspectives | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Photos of Mechanic's Exam | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Toxicological Report - Pilot | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Toxicological Report - Passenger | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
