The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN17LA148 · Final report

Cessna T210M accident near Detroit Lakes, Minnesota, April 5, 2017

On April 5, 2017 at about 7:10 pm local time, a 1977 Cessna T210M, registered N1215M, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Detroit Lakes, Minnesota (Detroit Lakes Airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The malfunction of the right main landing gear actuator for reasons that could not be determined because postaccident examination revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Contributing to the accident was the improper decision to disengage the landing gear system circuit breaker before the flight, which was contrary to the manufacturer-recommended procedures.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 5, 2017 · about 7:10 pm local time
Place
Detroit Lakes, Minnesota · Detroit Lakes Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T210M M, built 1977 · all T210Ms on the register
Registration
N1215M · registry record · serial 21061924
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot reported that, before the accident flight, the airplane had been experiencing intermittent landing gear problems and that the purpose of the flight was to bring the airplane to a maintenance facility to examine the landing gear system. He added that, before the flight, the landing gear circuit breaker was pulled out "in order to keep the gear in the down position and eliminate the gear warning horn" for the flight. While landing, the pilot noticed that the left wing slightly dropped after touchdown, and the pilot corrected with aileron to maintain the runway centerline. Shortly thereafter, the pilot could feel the right main landing gear (MLG) slowly collapse. The pilot was unable to maintain the airplane on the runway centerline, and the airplane exited the runway surface. The airplane came to rest upright with the right MLG collapsed, and the right horizontal stabilizer was bent. During a postaccident examination, the landing gear were retracted and extended multiple times. Each gear retraction was normal; however, the gear extension cycles resulted in the left MLG and nose landing gear extending and locking, and the right MLG extending with no movement from the downlock actuator. The actuator was removed for further examination, and it was difficult to move. After removal, the actuator released, and the internal spring mechanism freely moved the actuator. The actuator was disassembled with no internal problems noted. According to the Pilot's Operating Handbook, Section 3, "Emergency Procedures, Landing Gear Malfunction Procedures," the landing gear pump circuit breaker was to be positioned to the "in" position for all landing gear malfunction scenarios.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Landing gear actuator › Malfunction
  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Other/unknown
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of policy/procedure › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,080 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 64 in the last 90 days; 9 in the last 30 days; 300 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 31, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,810 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 29, 2016; 1 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,803 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor TSIO-520 SER (piston); 5,810 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: JKJ Moorhead MN at 6:50 pm
  • Destination: DTL Detroit Lakes MN
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 31, 4,500 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 350° at 12 knots, gusting 15
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 46°F (8°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
  • Observation at 7:13 pm from DTL

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N1215M the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

2021-05-02CEN21FA207 · accident near Oxford, IA · destroyed · fatal
1994-01-27CHI94LA073 · accident near Olathe, KS · substantial damage · serious injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.