Beech 200 accident near Gary, Indiana, December 30, 2015
On December 30, 2015 at about 3:00 pm local time, a 1980 Beech 200, registered N999VB, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Gary, Indiana (Gary/Chicago Intl airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 9 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot's failure to maintain the glidepath and appropriate airspeed during landing in icing conditions, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a hard landing.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- December 30, 2015 · about 3:00 pm local time
- Place
- Gary, Indiana · Gary/Chicago Intl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 9 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Beech 200 UNDESIGNAT, built 1980 · all 200s on the register
- Registration
- N999VB · registry record · serial BB-645
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The Part 135 passenger flight was cleared for an instrument landing system (ILS) approach to the destination airport in marginal VFR conditions. Radar data showed the airplane intercept the final approach course, cross over the course, then re-intercept it several times as the airplane approached the airport. Throughout the approach, the airplane flew level at an altitude about 2,300 ft above ground level (agl) until about 2 miles from the runway threshold, when it began to descend. The airplane crossed the runway threshold about 650 ft agl and subsequently landed hard on the runway, resulting in substantial damage. The pilot stated that the hard landing was the result of an aerodynamic stall at a higher airspeed than normal due to ice accumulation on the wings. Two line workers observed ice on the leading edges of both wings after the airplane landed. The operator's training manual stated that an approach that becomes unstabilized below 1,000 ft above airport elevation in instrument meteorological conditions or 500 ft above airport elevation in visual conditions required an immediate missed approach or go-around. Icing conditions were widespread along the airplane's route of flight. These conditions had been forecast, and numerous pilot reports confirmed the presence of icing in the area. The extent to which the pilot had familiarized himself with the current and forecast weather conditions before the flight could not be determined. Although the airplane was approved for flight in icing conditions and equipped with deicing boots, the investigation could not determine if or when the pilot cycled the boots. The manufacturer's flight manual warned that, even after cycling the boots, ice accumulation could remain on protected and unprotected surfaces, resulting in significant increases in stall speed. The manual also advised that ice could affect the aural stall warning system, and that pilots should maintain a "comfortable margin" of airspeed above normal stall speed. The aggressive flare that was likely required to arrest the airplane's high rate of descent on final approach, combined with the airplane's higher stall speed due to ice accumulation, likely resulted in an aerodynamic stall and subsequent hard landing.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Structural icing during approach (IFR final approach)
- Course deviation during approach (IFR final approach)
- Altitude deviation during approach (IFR final approach)
- Hard landing during landing defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Effect on equipment
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 29,388 hours in all; 8,759 in this make and model; 93 in the last 90 days; 28,604 as pilot in command; 1,369 on instruments
- Last flight review: November 23, 2015
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 6,589 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, November 19, 2015
- Maximum gross weight: 12,500 lb
- Seats: 11
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: P&W Canada PT6A-42 (turboprop); 1,099 hours total
- Engine 2: P&W Canada PT6A-42 (turboprop); 1,099 hours total
- Operator: Cobb Aviation Services Incorporated
The flight
- Departed from: SPI Springfield IL at 2:00 pm
- Destination: GYY Gary IN
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 30, 8,859 ft by 150 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 250° at 7 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 1,300 ft
- Temperature: 32°F (0°C), dew point 25°F (-4°C)
- Altimeter: 30.20 inHg
- Observation at 2:45 pm from KGYY
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 8 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
