The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN14LA345 · Final report

Cessna 210L accident near Las Vegas, New Mexico, July 3, 2014

On July 3, 2014, a 1972 Cessna 210L, registered N1175Q, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Las Vegas, New Mexico (Las Vegas Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured and 3 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's loss of airplane control during an aborted landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight planning, which resulted in his attempt to land on a runway closed by a notice to airmen and the loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 3, 2014
Place
Las Vegas, New Mexico · Las Vegas Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured and 3 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 210L M, built 1972 · all 210Ls on the register
Registration
N1175Q · no longer on the register · serial 21059675
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot reported that, when the airplane was about 200 ft above the ground on final approach after a cross-country flight, he saw vehicles and flashers on the runway. He attempted to abort the landing and started climbing the airplane, but the fuel "started cutting out," and he subsequently lost airplane control. A postaccident examination of the airplane, engine, and systems revealed no anomalies. There was no evidence of a fuel spill, and no fuel was visible within the wing fuel tanks. The fuel monitoring instrument indicated that 288 gallons of fuel were used and that 0 gallon of fuel was remaining. The airplane's total fuel capacity was 90 gallons; therefore, it is apparent that the pilot did not reset the fuel monitoring instrument after the airplane was refueled, which resulted in the instrument indicating an inaccurate fuel quantity. It is not known how much fuel was on board the airplane before its departure or whether it would have been sufficient to complete the trip. At the time of the accident, the runway was undergoing construction activities, and a notice to airmen (NOTAM) had been issued to close the runway for a period of about 3 days, including the accident date. Based on the evidence, it is likely that the pilot did not conduct adequate preflight planning, which resulted in his lack of awareness that the runway was closed by a NOTAM and his subsequent attempt to abort the landing. Further, his inadequate preflight planning did not ensure that there was sufficient fuel on board for the flight, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and the subsequent loss of engine power during the aborted landing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR go-around) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Flight planning/navigation › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 350 hours in all; 42 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,730 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, June 27, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,803 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO 520 -L (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AMW Ames IA
  • Destination: LVS Las Vegas NM
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 14, 8,199 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 150° at 13 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 4,900 ft
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.31 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.