The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC20CA032 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Big Lake, Alaska, March 10, 2020

On March 10, 2020 at about 4:30 am local time, a 1979 Cessna 172, registered N52168, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Big Lake, Alaska (Big Lake airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper decision to initiate the takeoff roll from a snow-covered taxiway, which resulted in a loss of directional control, runway excursion, and impact with a snow berm.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 10, 2020 · about 4:30 am local time · cases in 2020
Place
Big Lake, Alaska · Big Lake · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 N, built 1979 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N52168 · registry record · serial 17273457
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was attempting to take off from a snow-covered runway and that, during the first attempt, the airplane failed to generate enough airspeed, so he aborted the takeoff and exited the runway. On his second attempt, he chose to begin the takeoff roll with a high-speed taxi on a taxiway before turning 90° to enter the runway. Just before entering the runway, the airplane hit a dip in the taxiway, and the airplane veered left and impacted a snow berm, which resulted in substantial damage to the right wing. The pilot reported several ways that the accident could have been prevented, including parking the airplane and waiting for a snowplow to clear the runway. In addition, he indicated that he was fatigued and that his judgment and decision-making abilities were compromised.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during takeoff
  2. Loss of control on ground during takeoff defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during takeoff

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface › Snow/slush/ice covered surface › Decision related to condition
  • cause Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Snow/ice › Effect on operation
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Alertness/Fatigue › (general) › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,796 hours in all; 1,500 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 2,689 as pilot in command; 1,423 on instruments
  • Last flight review: December 8, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320-D2J (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Flight Safety Alaska Inc

The flight

  • Departed from: BGQ Big Lake AK
  • Destination: MRI Anchorage AK
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 07, 2,450 ft by 70 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 260° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 6,500 ft
  • Temperature: 23°F (-5°C), dew point 19°F (-7°C)
  • Observation at 4:56 am from PAYS, 8 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Photographs from the investigation 1 picture from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on April 15, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 9 pages View Download
2 Photo PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ANC20CA032.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.