The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC18LA031 · Final report

Cessna 208B accident near Atqasuk, Alaska, April 11, 2018

On April 11, 2018 at about 4:18 pm local time, a 2002 Cessna 208B, registered N814GV, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (descent) near Atqasuk, Alaska (Atqasuk Edward Burnell SR Memo airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was conditions the NTSB did not record.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's decision to continue a visual flight rules flight into an area of instrument meteorological conditions and his subsequent failure to level the airplane after the autopilot disconnected, which resulted in a collision with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 11, 2018 · about 4:18 pm local time
Place
Atqasuk, Alaska · Atqasuk Edward Burnell SR Memo · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
conditions the NTSB did not record
Aircraft
Cessna 208B, built 2002 · all 208Bs on the register
Registration
N814GV · registry record · serial 208B0958
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was on a visual flight rules flight transporting mail to a remote village. He reported that when he was about 15 minutes from the destination, he checked the automated weather observing system (AWOS) for updated weather information for the destination and recalled that the visibility was reported as 7 miles. However, the information he recalled was not consistent with what was actually reported by the AWOS; 18 minutes before the accident, the AWOS reported no more than 1 3/4 miles visibility. As he descended the airplane from 2,500 ft to 1,500 ft in the terminal area, he observed reduced visibility conditions that would require an instrument approach procedure. According to the pilot, while maneuvering toward the initial approach fix, he heard the autopilot disconnect, and the airplane began an uncommanded descent. He said that he remembered pulling on the control wheel and thought he had leveled off, but then the airplane impacted terrain, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, vertical stabilizer, and rudder. He could not recall if he had heard terrain warnings or alerts before the impact. An airplane performance study indicated that the airplane was in a continuous descent from 2,500 ft until the final data point about 12 ft above the surface; the airplane was not leveled off at any time during the descent. In the final 15 seconds of recorded data, the rate of descent increased from about 500 fpm to about 2,300 fpm before decreasing to 1,460 fpm at the last recorded data point. Postaccident examinations of the airframe, engine, flight control, and autopilot components revealed no mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation or affected flight controllability. It is likely that the unexpected instrument approach procedure increased the pilot's workload as he maneuvered to set up for the approach. Further, when the autopilot disconnected, the airplane continued to descend; although the pilot reported that he heard the autopilot disconnect, he did not arrest the airplane's descent rate. Given the low visibility conditions, it is likely that the pilot did not detect the airplane's descent, and the airplane descended into the terrain.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute (descent) defining event
  2. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during enroute (descent)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Decision related to condition
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
  • Flight time: 7,713 hours in all; 230 in the last 90 days; 90 in the last 30 days; 7,628 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: November 12, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 9,778.2 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, February 25, 2018; 168 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 9,062 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: P&W Canada PT6A-114A (turboprop); 3,950 hours total
  • Operator: Hageland Aviation Services INC

The flight

  • Departed from: PABR Utqiagvik AK at 10:58 am
  • Destination: ATK Atqasuk AK

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 030° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 9 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 7°F (-14°C), dew point 3°F (-16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.65 inHg
  • Observation at 10:53 am from PABR, 58 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

21 documents, released by the NTSB on December 20, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 PDF, 11 pages View Download
2 Interview Transcripts PDF, 159 pages View Download
3 Weather Study PDF, 21 pages View Download
4 Weather Study - Attachment 1 PDF, 16 pages View Download
5 Weather Study - Attachment 2 PDF, 9 pages View Download
6 Weather Study - Attachment 3 PDF, 27 pages View Download
7 Aircraft Performance ADS-B and EGPWS Study PDF, 37 pages View Download
8 Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report PDF, 16 pages View Download
9 Attachment 1 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Table of Pertinent EGPWS Data PDF, 2 pages View Download
10 Attachment 2 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Kc 225 Final Test Data Sheets PDF, 11 pages View Download
11 Attachment 3 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Kcm 100 Error Code Print Out for Cycle 89 PDF, 2 pages View Download
12 Attachment 4 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ks 270C Pitch Servo Actuator Test Data Sheets PDF, 2 pages View Download
13 Attachment 5 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ks 272C Trim Servo Actuator Test Data Sheet PDF, 2 pages View Download
14 Attachment 6 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ks 271C Yaw Autopilot Servo Actuator Test Data Sheet PDF, 2 pages View Download
15 Attachment 7 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ks 271C Roll Servo Actuator Test Data Sheet PDF, 2 pages View Download
16 Attachment 8 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Kg 102A Directional Gyro Test Data Sheets PDF, 3 pages View Download
17 Attachment 9 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ki 256 Flight Command Indicator Test Data Sheets PDF, 7 pages View Download
18 Attachment 10 - Airworthiness Group Chairman's Factual Report - Ki 525A Pictorial Nav Indicator Test Data Sheets PDF, 4 pages View Download
19 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 15 pages View Download
20 Toxicological Report PDF, 3 pages View Download
21 Photos PDF, 4 pages View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.