The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Parts · Heating, ice protection and utility systems

Spu

5 failure reports named the spu in the last ten years, 17 since 1997, most often on the Dehavilland DHC-8; the condition most often found was "damaged". 2 FAA approvals let 1 company make a replacement spu, Phoenix Aerospace INC holding the most (2).

Reports by year

012341997201212025
Reports by year, as a table
reports
19971
20052
20064
20082
20091
20121
20131
20181
20223
20251

How it failed the condition found, last ten years

damaged1failed1faulted1inoperative1unreliable1
Conditions found, as a table
reports
damaged1
failed1
faulted1
inoperative1
unreliable1

Approved replacement parts 2 parts manufacturer approvals

A parts manufacturer approval (PMA) lets a company other than the aircraft's maker make a spu and sell it as an approved part for the models named. These are the companies holding such approvals for a spu:

For these models most: Dehavilland DHC-8 (2).

MakerPartReplacesFitsGrantedStatus
Phoenix Aerospace INCSPU, Supplemental Power Unit DH1020-115-3CSIIdeHavilland Inc. 8SC0629deHavilland DHC-82001-05-03current
Phoenix Aerospace INCSPU, Supplemental Power Unit DH1020-115-3CSIIdeHavilland Inc. 8SC0629deHavilland DHC-81997-03-05current

Sources: the FAA's service difficulty reports since 1995 (a report is a part that failed and was fixed, as filed by an airline, repair station or owner; the count shows reporting as much as reliability) and the parts manufacturer approvals in the FAA's Dynamic Regulatory System. The part name is the reporters' and the approval holders' own words, reduced to the first plain words so that spellings meet.