The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR25LA071 · Final report

Cessna T210L accident near Gallup, New Mexico, December 28, 2024

On December 28, 2024 at about 4:03 am local time, a 1976 Cessna T210L, registered N505SW, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Gallup, New Mexico (Gallup Municipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 28, 2024 · about 4:03 am local time
Place
Gallup, New Mexico · Gallup Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna T210L, built 1976 · all T210Ls on the register
Registration
N505SW · registry record · serial 21061185
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

Before departing on a cross-country flight, the pilot fueled the airplane with about 20 gallons of fuel, using the airplane’s gauges to determine the airplane’s fuel quantity, which she believed to be 70 gallons. The pilot did not look inside the fuel tanks to verify the fuel quantity before departure. After about two hours of flight, while on approach to the destination airport, the engine lost total power and the pilot was unable to restore engine power or glide to the runway. During the subsequent forced landing in a vacant lot, the airplane impacted powerlines and rough terrain, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and right wing. According to the pilot, an unknown quantity of fuel was observed to leak from the airplane’s lower forward fuselage after the accident. During the airplane’s recovery from the accident site, only trace amounts of fuel were found within the fuel system. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of a preexisting malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation, and a test run of the engine revealed no anomalies. The left-side fuel system was unobstructed and undamaged with exception of the left-side fuel reservoir tank, located in the lower forward fuselage, which displayed fuel staining and damage consistent with impact. No damage or voids were found in the right-side fuel system. As there were no mechanical anomalies with the engine or right-side fuel system, and there was no evidence to suggest that the left-side fuel system was compromised before impact, the engine likely lost power due to the pilot’s improper fuel management. The penetrated left side fuel reservoir tank was located at a low point in the fuel system relative to the left-wing fuel tank and leaked an unknown quantity of fuel at the accident site. The investigation could not determine if the loss of power was due to fuel starvation or exhaustion, as the remaining fuel quantity in the left tank at the time of the accident is unknown.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Fuel related during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Wire › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; multi-engine sea; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: unmanned (suas)
  • Flight time: 981.4 hours in all; 49.4 in this make and model; 96.7 in the last 90 days; 23.2 in the last 30 days; 812.9 as pilot in command; 633.3 on instruments
  • Last flight review: November 1, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,800 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor TSIO-520-H (piston); 3,650 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: HII Lake Havasu City AZ at 2:10 am
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 24, 7,312 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 270° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 39°F (4°C), dew point 23°F (-5°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 pm from KGUP, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KGUP 280453Z AUTO 27008KT 10SM CLR 04/M05 A3000 RMK AO2 PK WND 27028/0407 SLP132 T00441050

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

11 documents, released by the NTSB on November 5, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.