Beech E 55 accident near Bakersfield, California, February 1, 2017
On February 1, 2017, a 1973 Beech E 55, registered N711YK, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Bakersfield, California (Meadows Field). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to select the proper fuel boost pump setting for the left auxiliary fuel pump, which allowed for an excessive fuel flow to the left engine, which resulted in a total loss of engine power and airplane control during an attempted go-around.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- February 1, 2017
- Place
- Bakersfield, California · Meadows Field · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Beech E 55 UNDESIGNAT, built 1973 · all E 55s on the register
- Registration
- N711YK · no longer on the register · serial TE-922
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The commercial pilot reported that, following an uneventful flight to break in the recently installed rebuilt left engine, he entered the airport traffic pattern. As the airplane crossed over the runway threshold, he reduced power, and the airplane began to settle into ground effect. Subsequently, the pilot initiated a go-around. When he applied power, the right engine responded; however, the left engine did not respond, and the airplane immediately began rolling and yawing left. The pilot reduced power and applied control inputs, but the airplane continued to yaw left and then impacted terrain. Photographs obtained from airport management showed that, immediately following the accident, the left auxiliary fuel pump switch was in the "low" position. Both engines were test run in an engine test cell, and they started and operated normally at various power settings. The left auxiliary fuel pump was operationally tested and compared to the limits noted on the manufacturer's data plate. During functional tests in the low-boost setting, the fuel flow rate was almost double the minimum specification for the low-boost setting and higher than the minimum high-boost fuel flow rate. Leaking fluid was observed around the outlet fitting, so the outlet fitting was removed; an O-ring was found damaged, which likely resulted in fuel leaking around the outlet fitting. The investigation could not determine how or when the O-ring was damaged. A new O-ring was installed, and functional tests were conducted again. In the low-boost setting, the fuel flow rate was again more than double the minimum specification for the low-boost setting and higher than the minimum high-boost fuel flow rate. During a review of airframe and engine maintenance records, no entries were found pertaining to the left auxiliary fuel pump. The Pilot's Operating Handbook specified that, before takeoff or landing, the auxiliary fuel pumps should be off unless the ambient temperature is 90°F or above, in which case they should be set at "low." The ambient temperature at the time of the accident was 64°F. Therefore, it is likely that, during the attempted go-around, the left auxiliary fuel pump was positioned to "low" and that this, in combination with the excessive fuel flow rate while positioned to the low-boost setting, resulted in the loss of engine power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR go-around)
- Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR go-around) defining event
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (VFR go-around)
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel pumps › Incorrect use/operation
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel distribution › Capability exceeded
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 8,056 hours in all; 1,581 in this make and model; 8,056 as pilot in command; 5,900 on instruments
- Last flight review: January 1, 2017
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 8,012.6 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, March 1, 2016
- Maximum gross weight: 5,302 lb
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: Continental IO-520-CB (piston); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: Continental IO-520-C (piston); 1,754 hours total
- Operator: California Aeronautical University
The flight
- Departed from: BFL Bakersfield CA at 11:30 pm
- Destination: BFL Bakersfield CA
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 30R, 10,849 ft by 150 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 290° at 3 knots
- Visibility: 5 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on January 16, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 2 | NTSB Airframe and Engine Examination Summary Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Continental Motors Engine Run Reports | PDF, 22 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Beech E-55 Pilot Operating Handbook | PDF, 422 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Auxilary Fuel Pump Examination Notes | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Photo Array | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
