The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR12TA445 · Final report

Beech C90 accident near Boise, Idaho, May 10, 2012

On May 10, 2012, a Beech C90, registered N14CP, was substantially damaged in an accident near Boise, Idaho. It was a public-use flight (federal) under public-use (government) rules. No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was conditions the NTSB did not record.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Excessive loading on the left wing, which occurred over a period of time. Contributing to the accident was maintenance personnel’s failure to adequately inspect and document the left wing damage.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 10, 2012 · cases in 2012
Place
Boise, Idaho · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
conditions the NTSB did not record
Aircraft
Beech C90 · all C90s on the register
Registration
N14CP · registry record · serial LJ-585
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Public-use flight (federal) · public-use (government) rules

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane had been contracted to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for 6 months, and it was primarily used in fire management activities in low-level lead airplane and air attack missions; these type of operations were susceptible to turbulent conditions. BLM provided the pilots, and the contract company provided the airplane and maintenance personnel. During a postcontract inspection, maintenance personnel found substantial damage to the outer left wing. The BLM reported that, about 1 month into the 6-month contract period, a BLM pilot and contract mechanic noted deformation and wrinkling damage to the left wing; the mechanic inspected the area, and it was subsequently monitored for further damage. Three months later, the BLM pilot reported to a relief mechanic that he had encountered moderate turbulence. The mechanic subsequently completed a turbulent air inspection but noted no damage and considered the airplane airworthy. When the contract mechanic returned to work, he inspected the airplane and told the pilot that the wrinkle appeared to be "a little worse"; however, no actions were taken. The airplane was subsequently flown until the contract expired without incident. A review of the maintenance logbooks found no entries related to any maintenance actions or inspections of the damaged left wing. About 2 months after the contract expired, the contract company's maintenance personnel observed that the damage had worsened. The damage was consistent with the wing assembly having experienced loading in excess of its normal operating limits, likely during turbulent conditions. The airplane was then taken out of service for repairs. The damage was likely cumulative as the airplane was flown in turbulent conditions. If the maintenance inspections had been documented in the logbooks, it likely would have necessitated further inspection by maintenance personnel and resulted in the airplane's removal from service at an earlier date.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during unknown defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › Plates/skins (on wing) › Capability exceeded other cases naming the airframe structure
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Inadequate inspection
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Record › keeping › Aircraft/maintenance logs › Maintenance personnel
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › (general) › Maintenance personnel
  • factor Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Related records

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 12,595 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, August 10, 2012; 27 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 10,485 lb
  • Seats: 9
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: P&W PT6A SER (turboprop); 12,709 hours total
  • Engine 2: P&W PT6A SER (turboprop); 12,229 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: not recorded

Weather at the time

  • Light: not reported
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

3 documents, released by the NTSB on January 12, 2016. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR12TA445.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.