Piper PA28 accident near Louisville, Kentucky, October 11, 2024
On October 11, 2024 at about 10:20 pm local time, a 1961 Piper PA28, registered N5006W, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Louisville, Kentucky (Bowman Fld airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 11, 2024 · about 10:20 pm local time
- Place
- Louisville, Kentucky · Bowman Fld · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was seriously injured and 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA28 160, built 1961 · all PA28s on the register
- Registration
- N5006W · registry record · serial 28-7
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
During a familiarization and check-out flight, and after completing several maneuvers about 25 miles from the departure airport, the pilots elected to return to the departure airport. After turning on an approximate 8-mile final approach, the pilot had the engine set to a low power setting, the carburetor heat on, and switched the fuel tanks. After the airplane had descended to about 1,000 ft mean sea level (msl), the pilot reported that the engine’s throttle was unresponsive. The instructor took control of the airplane and attempted to perform a forced landing in a grassy area beside a road. During the approach for landing, the airplane impacted a light pole and an automobile. Postaccident examination of the wreckage revealed that the both wings, the fuselage, and empennage had sustained substantial damage as a result of the accident. An initial examination of the wreckage found that the fuel selector valve was in between the two “OFF” detents; however, the airplane had been recovered before the wreckage could be examined and it could not be determined whether the as-found position was indicative of its position at the time of the accident. Testing of the valve in this position revealed that flow from the valve was completely obstructed. Further testing revealed that the valve’s detents were positive, and that it functioned normally when the left and right fuel tanks were selected. Further examination of the airframe’s fuel system revealed that the main vent system for the left fuel tank was obstructed; however, the vented cap for the left fuel tank was unobstructed, which would have allowed proper venting of the left fuel system. The carburetor underwent additional testing on a production test bench and was disassembled and examined. The carburetor performed normally with a slightly leaner fuel flow when tested at two of the test points. Further examination revealed that the throttle valve shaft and bushings displayed wear, allowing side motion of the throttle shaft, which could have allowed a small amount of bypass air to enter the throttle body, and lean the fuel/air mixture. It is likely that the slightly lean postaccident tests were a result of the worn throttle valve shaft and bushing; however, this small amount of leaning would not have prevented normal operation of the engine. The weather conditions at the time of the accident were conducive to serious carburetor icing at low power settings. According to the pilot, the carburetor heat was used during the final approach. The position of the carburetor heat control and valve could not be confirmed during the postaccident examinations due to the impact damage to both the control and the carburetor airbox; therefore, the functionality of the carburetor heat could not be confirmed. Overall, the wreckage examination was unable to identify evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the airframe or engine would have precluded normal operation. The impact-related damage to the airplane and engine otherwise prevented a test run that could have checked the various systems as a whole.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (total) during approach defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during landing
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Power plant › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
- Aircraft › Aircraft handling/service › Maintenance/inspections › (general) › Not serviced/maintained
Flight instructor
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, remote
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: unmanned (suas)
- Flight time: 1,218.5 hours in all; 51.8 in this make and model; 163.3 in the last 90 days; 34.4 in the last 30 days; 1,135 as pilot in command; 834.3 on instruments
- Last flight review: March 28, 2024
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: serious injuries
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 117.9 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 1 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 25.8 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: March 25, 2024
- Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: minor injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,178.7 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, September 7, 2024; 10.4 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,200 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-320-D2A (piston); 2,453 hours total
- Operator: Louisville Flying Club
The flight
- Departed from: LOU Louisville KY at 9:47 pm
- Flight plan: none
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: dusk
- Wind: from 160° at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
- Altimeter: 30.14 inHg
- Observation at 6:42 pm from LOU, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KLOU 112242Z 16004KT 10SM CLR 22/09 A3014 RMK AO2 T02220094 $
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | 1 |
Photographs from the investigation 17 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photograph 1 – Airplane at accident site
Photograph 2 – Damaged car and airplane at accident site
Photograph 3 – Airplane after initial recovery
Photograph 4 – Airplane after initial recovery
Photograph 5 – Fuel selector handle as found after initial recovery
Photograph 6 – Instrument panel as found after initial recovery
Photograph 7 – Instrument panel as found after initial recovery
Photograph 8 – Airplane overview after recovery to AMF
Photograph 9 – Fuel selector valve
Photograph 10 – Fuel strainer and fuel line
Photograph 11 – Fuel line going from firewall to fuel strainer
Photograph 12 – Left fuel cap
Photograph 13 – Right fuel cap
Photograph 14 – Engine fuel primer
Photograph 15 – Engine overview (left side)
Photograph 16 – Propeller overview
Photograph 17 - Propeller overviewThe NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
19 documents, released by the NTSB on August 26, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
