The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA23LA202 · Final report

Rockwell International 112 accident near Miami, Florida, April 18, 2023

On April 18, 2023 at about 1:13 pm local time, a 1975 Rockwell International 112, registered N12RX, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Miami, Florida (Miami Exec airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Failure of the right main landing gear due to inadequate hydraulic pressure as result of a torn O-ring that was installed on the hydraulic pack’s check valve during overhaul.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 18, 2023 · about 1:13 pm local time
Place
Miami, Florida · Miami Exec · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Rockwell International 112, built 1975 · all 112s on the register
Registration
N12RX · no longer on the register · serial 270
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

When the pilot extended the landing gear in preparation for landing, she confirmed that all three green, gear-down indicator lights illuminated and felt the gear lock into place. However, upon touchdown, the right main landing gear collapsed, and the airplane veered off the runway and came to rest on the grass, resulting in substantial damage to the right wing. The nose and left main landing gear remained extended. Airport surveillance video was consistent with the pilot’s account. Examination of the airplane revealed hydraulic fluid was visible down the belly of the airplane and the hydraulic reservoir was nearly empty. The airplane was placed on jacks and hydraulic fluid was added to the system. The gear was tested and functioned normally through its full extension and retraction cycle, but hydraulic fluid was observed leaking from the landing gear system’s hydraulic power pack. A review of maintenance records revealed the hydraulic power pack had been recently overhauled and was installed on the airplane about 1.8 hours before the accident. Testing of the power pack revealed it functioned normally when the gear was extended; however, it would not hold pressure when the gear was retracted due to a leak at the check valve on the return port for the gear-downside of the pack. The check valve was removed, and two tears were observed on the valve’s O-ring. According to the company that had recently overhauled the pack, it’s not uncommon to see a tear/rupture on the O-ring after a gear collapse due to the back pressure of fluid that gets forced into the check valve. Visual examination of the tears revealed that the larger tear was in the direction of fluid flow when the gear collapsed. The other smaller tear was in the middle of the O-ring and it could not be determined if the tear was from the gear collapse. Since no other leaks or mechanical anomalies were observed in the postaccident examination of the landing gear system, this second smaller tear most likely occurred during the overhaul and resulted in a slow leak of hydraulic fluid and the subsequent loss of hydraulic pressure needed to fully extend the right main landing gear. Though the pilot reported observing the gear-down indicator lights before landing, the gear-down microswitch may have been loose or improperly timed, providing a false gear-down “safe” indication before the gear was actually down and locked.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing defining event
  2. Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Hydraulic power system › Hydraulic, main system › Malfunction
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Scheduled/routine maintenance › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 630 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 40 in the last 30 days; 590 as pilot in command; 100 on instruments
  • Last flight review: December 21, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,044 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 9, 2023; 1.5 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,650 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-C1D6 (piston); 3,045 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: HWO Hollywood FL at 1:50 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 09L/, 5,003 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 010° at 13 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 am from KTMB

Weather report (METAR): METAR KTMB 181353Z 01013KT 10SM CLR 23/13 A2997

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

12 documents, released by the NTSB on March 19, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA23LA202.