The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24FA327 · Final report

Piper PA-28-140 accident near Wayne, Nebraska, August 26, 2024

On August 26, 2024 at about 2:31 pm local time, a 1976 Piper PA-28-140, registered N9626K, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Wayne, Nebraska. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The non-instrument-rated pilot’s encounter with instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation and a loss of control.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 26, 2024 · about 2:31 pm local time
Place
Wayne, Nebraska · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-140, built 1976 · all PA-28-140s on the register
Registration
N9626K · no longer on the register · serial 28-7625186
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The non-instrument-rated pilot departed on a visual flight rules (VFR) cross-country flight in visual meteorological conditions. Flight track data indicated that the airplane departed and flew northeast for about 15 minutes at altitudes less than 1,000 ft above ground level (agl) before entering a right turn with varying altitude, heading, and ground speed changes. A witness near the accident site stated that the clouds were about 100 ft agl when he heard the airplane fly over his house. Shortly thereafter, he heard the engine sound increase; the airplane impacted the ground and a postimpact fire ensued. The last flight track data point indicated the airplane was 1,030 ft agl, heading north at a ground speed of 51 knots. The accident site was located about 1,000 ft north-northwest of the last data point, about 27 nautical miles from the departure airport. The airplane impacted the ground in a steep descent and came to rest inverted. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The wreckage debris path and propeller damage signatures, in addition to the witness statement, were consistent with the engine producing power at the time of impact. Review of weather information revealed conditions favorable for sustained, low-level cloud cover, but there were no AIRMETs in effect for instrument flight rules conditions. Although forecasts indicated few to scattered clouds around 600 ft agl, recorded weather conditions from the airport closest to the accident site indicated an overcast ceiling at 600 ft agl. Based on available weather information, it is likely that the accident pilot encountered instrument meteorological conditions shortly after takeoff. The pilot’s friend stated that the pilot checked the weather on his tablet on the morning of the accident; however, there was no record of the pilot obtaining weather information from an access-controlled source such as Leidos Flight Service or ForeFlight. Therefore, the extent of the pilot’s preflight weather planning could not be determined. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the non-instrument-rated pilot’s encounter with instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in the loss of visual references, spatial disorientation, and loss of airplane control. The pilot’s postmortem toxicology results indicated he had used the sedating antihistamine medication diphenhydramine and may have been experiencing associated impairing effects at the time of the accident. It is possible that his diphenhydramine use might have increased his susceptibility to spatial disorientation. No blood was available for testing, and more specific conclusions about diphenhydramine effects could not be drawn from the toxicology results in tissue. Visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions by a non-instrument-rated pilot carries a high risk of spatial disorientation even in the absence of impairment. Overall, whether the pilot’s use of diphenhydramine contributed to the accident could not be determined. One laboratory detected ethanol at a high level in a brain tissue specimen, while another laboratory did not detect ethanol in brain or muscle tissue specimens. In the setting of extensive injuries, the detected ethanol likely was from postmortem sources, rather than alcohol consumption. It is unlikely that ethanol effects contributed to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute
  2. VFR encounter with IMC during enroute defining event
  3. Loss of control in flight during enroute (cruise)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action selection › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Obscuration › Response/compensation
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Decision related to condition
  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusion › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total instrument experience › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Instrument flight capability › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 672 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,876 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2024
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,150 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-D3G (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: OFK Norfolk NE at 2:10 pm
  • Destination: CFE Buffalo MN
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 9 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 600 ft
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 am from KLCG, 7 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KLCG 261455Z AUTO 31009KT 10SM OVC006 25/23 A3006 RMK AO2 T02460230

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 8 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

13 documents, released by the NTSB on September 18, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 On-site Wreckage Exam Summary PDF, 7 pages · our copy View Download
2 Photos PDF, 9 pages · our copy View Download
3 Witness Statements PDF, 6 pages · our copy View Download
4 Illustrations PDF, 6 pages · our copy View Download
5 Opsvue Data - Tabular data file · our copy Download
6 Opsvue Data - Kml File map file · our copy Download
7 Weather Factual Report PDF, 38 pages · our copy View Download
8 Weather Attachment 1 GIF file · our copy Download
9 Electronic Device - Specialist's Factual Report PDF, 3 pages · our copy View Download
10 Memorandum for Record - Maintenance Record Review PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
11 Maintenance Records PDF, 47 pages · our copy View Download
12 Bulk Wreckage Release PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
13 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.