The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN19LA306 · Final report

Pietenpol Sky Scout accident near Kingsbury, Texas, September 7, 2019

On September 7, 2019 at about 3:07 pm local time, a 1999 Pietenpol Sky Scout, an amateur-built aircraft,, registered N1932G, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Kingsbury, Texas (Old Kingsbury Aerodrome airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined with the available evidence and the pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack, which led to an aerodynamic stall and spin at a low altitude.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 7, 2019 · about 3:07 pm local time
Place
Kingsbury, Texas · Old Kingsbury Aerodrome · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Pietenpol Sky Scout, built 1999, amateur-built
Registration
N1932G · registry record · serial VA-2
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was conducting a postmaintenance flight. Shortly after liftoff and while the airplane was in a climbing left turn, the airplane lost total engine power. The pilot reported that, about 7 seconds after liftoff he heard the engine “splutter” as it decelerated from takeoff power toward idle. He pushed the control stick forward to reduce the airplane's angle of attack, but the airplane impacted terrain in a nose-down attitude. One witness reported that, after the loss of engine power, the airplane’s left wing dropped, and the airplane entered an aerodynamic spin that continued about one-half of a rotation before the airplane impacted the ground. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the forward fuselage and engine mount during impact. A postaccident engine examination revealed no evidence of a mechanical failure that would have resulted in the total loss of engine power. The airplane’s fuel tank cap had a cracked rubber seal that had hardened from age, and the fuel cap vent holes were small and partially obstructed by the seal. An inadequately vented fuel cap could have resulted in a negative pressure within the fuel tank and fuel starvation to the engine. Additionally, the carburetor heat flexible hose was found disconnected from the carburetor, and there was no attachment hardware present. The weather conditions at the time and location of the accident were conducive to a serious accumulation of carburetor icing with the engine at glide (descent) power. On the basis of the available evidence, the investigation was unable to determine whether inadequate fuel tank venting or carburetor icing caused the total loss of engine power. However, after the loss of engine power, the pilot likely exceeded the airplane’s critical angle of attack, and the airplane subsequently entered an aerodynamic stall and spin from which recovery was not possible due to the airplane’s low altitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during initial climb defining event
  2. Loss of control in flight during landing
  3. Aerodynamic stall/spin during landing
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 6,700 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 75 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 6,650 as pilot in command; 800 on instruments
  • Last flight review: February 20, 2019
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: sngl
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 34.4 hours
  • Last inspection: condition inspection, February 24, 2019; 1 hours since
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Ford Model A (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Freeman Heritage Collection LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: 85TE Kingsbury TX at 3:07 pm
  • Destination: 85TE Kingsbury TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 14, 2,600 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 1,900 ft
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.11 inHg
  • Observation at 2:58 pm from SEQ, 6 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KSEQ 071458Z AUTO 21005KT 10SM FEW019 29/23 A3011 RMK AO2 SLP191 T02850231 52008=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

9 documents, released by the NTSB on August 23, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.