The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN18LA221 · Final report

Beech 58 accident near Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 8, 2018

On June 8, 2018 at about 9:05 pm local time, a 1977 Beech 58, registered N190RS, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Baton Rouge Metropolitan airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The improper insulation of the anticollision light wiring, which resulted in the ignition of combustible fuel vapors in the outboard section of the right wing; the source of the fuel leak could not be determined due to fire damage.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 8, 2018 · about 9:05 pm local time
Place
Baton Rouge, Louisiana · Baton Rouge Metropolitan · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech 58, built 1977 · all 58s on the register
Registration
N190RS · registry record · serial TH-804
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot reported that, during initial climb after takeoff, she heard a "loud bang" and saw flames coming from the trailing edge of the right wing. Subsequently, she was able to conduct an uneventful emergency landing. The fire was located outboard of the right engine near the wingtip and auxiliary fuel tank. Black soot was visible near the right wingtip navigation and anticollision lights. Black soot and blue fuel stains were found near the fuel vents located on the bottom side of the wing under the right wingtip anticollision light. Blue fuel stains were also found under the right wing near the main and auxiliary fuel tanks and inside the wing cavity near the electrical wiring for the right wing navigation light. The examination of the right wing revealed that the wiring for the right wing anticollision light was crimped together with "handshake" connectors and then wrapped with electrical tape. The wiring was not properly insulated. The source of the fuel leak could not be determined due substantial damage to the right wing caused by the fire. About 6 1/2 years before the accident, the airplane manufacturer issued a Safety Communique titled, "Outboard Wing Fire Potential Due to Fuel Leaks and Electrical Wire Chafing." The communique advised owners and operators of a potential safety issue concerning loose wiring and fuel fumes in the structural areas of the airplane. The communique reminded owners and operators to maintain the fuel and electrical systems in accordance with the maintenance manuals and to ensure there were no visible fuel leaks around the vents and sump drains. It further stated that no fuel leaks or staining should be observed around the vents and sump drains during preflight inspections. Based on the postaccident examination, the fuel leak found on the bottom of the right wing might have been a preexisting condition; however, the pilot did not remember seeing any fuel staining during the preflight. The evidence further suggests that the initial ignition occurred behind the anticollision light in the right wingtip as a result of an improper repair, during which the anticollision light wiring was not properly insulated, which resulted in the ignition of combustible fuel vapors in the outboard section of the right wing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Explosion (non-impact) during initial climb defining event
  2. Fire/smoke (non-impact) during initial climb
  3. Aircraft structural failure during after landing
  4. Off-field or emergency landing during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Lighting system › Exterior lighting › Incorrect service/maintenance

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,813 hours in all; 60 in this make and model; 91 in the last 90 days; 44 in the last 30 days; 1,606 as pilot in command; 1,247 on instruments
  • Last flight review: December 11, 2017
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, October 3, 2017; 5,941 hours since
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental IO-520-C (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental IO-520-C (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: BTR Baton Rouge LA at 9:00 pm
  • Destination: JBR Jonesboro LA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 31, 7,005 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 280° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 88°F (31°C), dew point 66°F (19°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 8:53 pm from BTR

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

13 documents, released by the NTSB on September 9, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.