Extra Flugzeugbau Gmbh EA 300/L accident near Las Cruces, New Mexico, October 20, 2024
On October 20, 2024 at about 8:24 am local time, a 1996 Extra Flugzeugbau Gmbh EA 300/L, registered N512DW, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering (aerobatics) near Las Cruces, New Mexico (Las Cruces Intl airport). It was an air show or air race flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s entry into an aerobatic maneuver at an altitude that was insufficient to complete a successful recovery, which resulted in an accelerated stall and impact with terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 20, 2024 · about 8:24 am local time
- Place
- Las Cruces, New Mexico · Las Cruces Intl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Extra Flugzeugbau Gmbh EA 300/L, built 1996 · all EA 300/Ls on the register
- Registration
- N512DW · registry record · serial 019
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Air show or air race flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was conducting aerobatic maneuvers over desert terrain during an airshow. About 5 minutes into the routine, video evidence showed that the airplane completed two forward tumbles followed by a third tumble that paused briefly while inverted. The airplane then entered a near-vertical descent. In an apparent attempt to recover toward show center, the pilot initiated a high-positive-G pull-up. As the recovery progressed, the right wing appeared to enter an accelerated stall. The airplane subsequently impacted the ground in a nose-low, right-rolling attitude and was destroyed. Examination revealed no anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation, and damage signatures and witness accounts indicated that the engine was producing power at the time of the accident. The density altitude at the time of the accident was 6,554 ft above mean sea level (msl). The pilot’s shallow upline entry angle into the maneuver, which was less than 45° from level flight and below the pilot’s customary entry profile based on a review of his previous performances of the same maneuver, provided less altitude and energy at the start of the maneuver. Additionally, the pilot initiated the maneuver from an orientation that directed energy toward the ground; initiating the maneuver in the opposite direction would have resulted in an upward energy vector. Subsequent maneuver execution further degraded the airplane’s energy state and available control authority. The pilot’s control inputs during the final portion of the maneuver resulted in an inverted flat spin that culminated in an accelerated aerodynamic stall. A higher entry altitude would have provided additional recovery margin and may have better accommodated the reduction in performance associated with the prevailing high density altitude conditions. The pilot’s initiation of the tumble maneuver at an insufficient altitude with a downward energy vector, combined with the elevated density altitude and pilot’s control inputs, resulted in a loss of energy that culminated in an unrecoverable low-altitude stall.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during maneuvering (aerobatics)
- Aerodynamic stall/spin during maneuvering (aerobatics) defining event
- Attempted remediation/recovery during maneuvering (aerobatics)
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Incorrect use/operation
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, commercial pilot, remote
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider; rotorcraft: helicopter; rotorcraft: unmanned (suas)
- Flight time: 11,334 hours in all
- Last flight review: January 0, 1900
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,344 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, September 14, 2024; 3 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 2,095 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming AEIO-540-L1B5 (piston); 614 hours total
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 4/22, 6,069 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 200° at 10 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: scat at 6,000 ft
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 30.20 inHg
- Observation at 2:35 pm from KLRU, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KLRU 202035Z AUTO 20010KT 10SM SCT060 SCT080 26/07 A3020 RMK AO2 T02550073
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
10 documents, released by the NTSB on September 30, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Memorandum for Record A�� Airport Operations | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 2 | Mor Conversation Sme | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 3 | Mor Email NTSB RE-60 | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 4 | Logbook Pilot and Maintenance Endorsments | PDF, 29 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 5 | Accident Site Examination | PDF, 9 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 6 | Airframe and Engine Examination | PDF, 9 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 7 | Photos | PDF, 4 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 8 | Video | MOV file · our copy | Download |
| 9 | Forensic Toxicology Report | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 10 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR25FA020.
