The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB WPR16FA007 · Final report

Beech G35 accident near South Lake Tahoe, California, October 11, 2015

On October 11, 2015, a 1956 Beech G35, registered N4485D, was destroyed in an accident during enroute (climb to cruise) near South Lake Tahoe, California (Lake Tahoe airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's inability to maintain airplane control due to an encounter with a downdraft that exceeded the airplane’s climb performance capabilities and resulted in an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to depart without obtaining a weather briefing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
October 11, 2015
Place
South Lake Tahoe, California · Lake Tahoe · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech G35 NO SERIES, built 1956 · all G35s on the register
Registration
N4485D · no longer on the register · serial D-4641
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The private pilot and passenger were departing on a personal cross-country flight. During takeoff, witnesses observed that the airplane was struggling to gain altitude and noted that the engine sounded as if it was not producing adequate power. They added that, as the airplane crossed over the airport boundaries, it climbed to about 100 ft above ground level in an excessively high pitch-up attitude. Shortly thereafter, the airplane crossed a ridgeline, entered a nose- and left-wing-low attitude, and impacted the backyard of a residence. While ceiling and visibility were not an issue in this accident, the wind magnitude and changes in wind direction likely affected the flight. Wind gusts were as high as 26 knots around the accident time, and weather observation sites within 3 miles of the accident site all reported large changes in wind direction around the accident time. Although the wind was mainly from the south to southwest, there were times when the wind came from the west and north. This change in wind direction was likely due to mountain wave conditions and wind flow over the mountainous terrain, and these changes in wind direction and gusts likely affected the accident flight and the pilot's ability to control the airplane. Wreckage and impact signatures were consistent with a left-wing-low and nose-low impact. Postaccident examination of the airframe, flight control system, and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Based on the witness observations and the recorded weather data, it is likely that the airplane encountered a downdraft that exceeded the airplane's climb performance, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and a subsequent aerodynamic stall. An area forecast, issued about 5 hours before the accident, forecasted southwest wind at 20 knots with gusts to 30 knots for the time surrounding the accident. A terminal aerodrome forecast issued 1 hour before the accident, forecasted wind from 190 degrees at 11 knots gusting to 20 knots. However, there is no evidence that the pilot obtained weather information before the flight, thus he may not have been aware of the gusting wind conditions that affected the flight.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Turbulence encounter during enroute (climb to cruise)
  2. Loss of control in flight during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during enroute (climb to cruise)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Climb capability › Capability exceeded
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Downdraft › Effect on operation
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,580 hours in all; 158 in this make and model; 1,534 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,935.5 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, March 21, 2015
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,775 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Continental Motors E-225-8 (piston); 3,380 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: TVL South Lake Tahoe CA
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 10 knots, gusting 21
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.09 inHg
  • Observation at 11:53 pm from KTVL, 2 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR16FA007.