The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB LAX04LA149 · Final report

Cessna 402A accident near Peach Springs, Arizona, March 9, 2004

On March 9, 2004 at about 6:25 pm local time, a Cessna 402A, registered N99AT, was substantially damaged in an accident near Peach Springs, Arizona (Grand Canyon West airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 10 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the pilot's inadequate flare and touchdown that imparted high side loadings on the right main landing gear, which resulted in an overload failure of the landing gear bellcrank and the collapse of that gear.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 9, 2004 · about 6:25 pm local time
Place
Peach Springs, Arizona · Grand Canyon West · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 10 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 402A · all 402As on the register
Registration
N99AT · registry record · serial 402A-0022
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The right main landing gear collapsed during the landing roll. The pilot placed the landing gear in the down position on downwind and noted three green lights, which indicated that the gear was down and locked. He noted a left crosswind, and landed on the left main landing gear first and then the right main landing gear. When the right main landing gear touched the ground, it folded up, and the airplane departed the runway. The airplane went over a berm, which sheared off the left main landing gear and the nose landing gear. The passengers safely deplaned. A pilot in another company airplane about 1 mile behind and 1,000 feet above the accident airplane observed the landing. He indicated that the approach and landing appeared normal. According to the Federal Aviation Administration inspector who inspected the accident scene, the airplane touched down near the threshold. There were two propeller strikes on the runway about 15 inches apart about 40 feet past the touchdown point. About 200 feet farther down the runway, there were multiple propeller strikes. The area between the first set of propeller strikes and the second set was clear of any marks. The inspector observed skid marks that began at the second set of propeller strikes and continued down the runway where the airplane departed the runway. The airplane had flown 2 hours since a routine maintenance inspection that included many components of the landing gear system. No discrepancies were noted on the failed components of the right main landing gear. Post accident inspection by the operator's maintenance personnel found that the pivot bolt in the right main landing gear bellcrank assembly (part number NAS 464P4-26) had sheared in two places, and the clevis ears at both ends of the bell crank were fractured. They said that this lead to other parts shifting and breaking, which lead to the right main landing gear collapsing. Metallurgical examination of the bell crank, the clevis ears, and the bolt determined that all of the materials examined were within specification. None of the fractures showed any evidence of pre-existing damage or fatigue cracking. The bolt fractured in shear overstress on a plane flush with the edge of the bellcrank. The damage to the pivot bolt appeared to be most consistent with an event where the gear was heavily loaded outward, away from its normal retracted position. Detailed analysis of the loadings on the failed components and the lack of damage on the surrounding structures and landing gear parts revealed no obvious scenario that would have led to the bellcrank being the first component loaded sufficiently to cause the damage observed and/or initiate the collapse of the landing gear. It is most likely that the damage to the bellcrank was a result of the collapse of the gear, rather than a cause.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,500 hours in all; 500 in this make and model; 90 in the last 90 days; 30 in the last 30 days; 2,300 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: November 1, 2003
  • Medical certificate: Class 1
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 19,248 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, March 1, 2004
  • Maximum gross weight: 6,300 lb
  • Seats: 10
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Teledyne Continental TSIO-520-E (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Teledyne Continental TSIO-520-E (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: King Airlines, Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: HND Henderson NV at 5:30 pm
  • Destination: 1G4 Peach Springs AZ
  • Runway 17, 5,058 ft by 60 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 68°F (20°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.18 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from VGT, 78 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers9

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.