The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB LAX00GA185 · Final report

Beech 65-90 accident near China Lake, California, May 5, 2000

On May 5, 2000 at about 5:15 pm local time, a Beech 65-90, registered N32229, was substantially damaged in an accident near China Lake, California (China Lake airport). It was a public-use flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 3 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

the inadvertent early deployment of the test parachute lines and dummy and it's entanglement with the horizontal stabilizer, which resulted from the operator's inadequate test plan substantiation process for shortening the parachute's static line. .

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 5, 2000 · about 5:15 pm local time
Place
China Lake, California · China Lake · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 3 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech 65-90 · all 65-90s on the register
Registration
N32229 · no longer on the register · serial LJ-49
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Public-use flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The twin-engine airplane experienced a loss of control after becoming entangled with a deploying parachute during cruise flight at 20,000 feet and 180 knots. The test flight was conducted to test an experimental parachute with a 331-pound anthropomorphic dummy that was rigged to the parachute. Two crewmembers in the airplane's cabin were to push the dummy out of the door and the parachute would deploy by pulling on a static line that was secured to a floor seat track. The static line for this flight had been reduced in length from 14 feet to 9 feet because of a previous test flight where a pin on the end of the static line became entangled with the elevator hinge and caused control problems. With the shortened static line, it was in tension when the dummy was positioned in the doorway. During the accident flight, once the dummy cleared the doorway, the static line deployed the pilot chute which in turn deployed the drogue chute. The drogue chute cleared the top of the left horizontal stabilizer while the dummy fell below. The dummy began oscillating and impacted the empennage and lower side of the horizontal stabilizer, eventually resulting in the partial separation and bending down of the stabilizer about midspan. As the dummy became entangled on the left horizontal stabilizer, the airplane made an uncommanded nose over into a negative G arc, which threw one crewmember about the cabin while the second crewmember was able to restrain himself by holding onto the static line. As the main parachute deployed, the drogue chute lines separated and the dummy and canopies fell away from the airplane. As the dummy fell away, the airplane pitched up and began an uncommanded roll to the right, stopping in a fully inverted attitude. The airplane initially nosed forward and then began a slow roll to the left, eventually stabilizing in wings level attitude. The pilots then returned the airplane to the airport and landed without further incident. Review of the parachute test program's Test Hazard Analysis revealed that the plan's cause/effect assessment and hazard mitigation actions inadequately addressed all potential "out of aircraft" hazard possibilities, including the effect of the parachute lines and/or dummy becoming entangled on the horizontal stabilizer. Additionally, no revision to the Test Hazard Analysis was noted after the previous static line entanglement incident and subsequent shortening of the static line.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, flight engineer, private
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 22,874 hours in all; 183 in this make and model; 62 in the last 90 days; 30 in the last 30 days; 13,761 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: November 17, 1998
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 3,200 hours in all; 40 in this make and model; 60 in the last 90 days; 15 in the last 30 days; 3,000 as pilot in command; 1,370 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 9, 1998
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (valid medical--no waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,749.4 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, February 15, 2000; 22.3 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 9,300 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-6 (turboprop); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PT6A-6 (turboprop); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: NID China Lake CA at 4:45 pm
  • Destination: NID China Lake
  • Runway 32, 9,011 ft by 200 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 190° at 14 knots
  • Visibility: 35 statute miles
  • Sky: broken clouds at 20,000 ft; scat at 8,000 ft
  • Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.00 inHg
  • Observation at 4:56 pm from NID

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew13

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.