The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA19CA151 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Morristown, New Jersey, February 21, 2019

On February 21, 2019 at about 10:00 pm local time, a 2001 Cessna 172, registered N83AF, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Morristown, New Jersey (Morristown Muni airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The student pilot's improper rudder input and the flight instructor's delayed remedial action during takeoff, which resulted in a loss of directional control, a runway excursion, and the landing gear collapsing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 21, 2019 · about 10:00 pm local time
Place
Morristown, New Jersey · Morristown Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 R, built 2001 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N83AF · registry record · serial 17281052
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The flight instructor reported that, during takeoff with the student pilot on the flight controls, the airplane veered slightly left. The instructor assisted by applying rudder input, which corrected the veer, but then the airplane abruptly veered left. The instructor assumed control of the airplane, pulled the power, and applied brakes and rudder. The airplane exited the runway to the left into grass, and the nose landing gear collapsed. The student reported that he recalled the instructor telling him about the airplane's left turning tendencies and having to correct with the opposite (right) rudder. He added that he may have corrected with the wrong rudder during the takeoff. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the engine mount and fuselage. The flight instructor reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The airport's automated weather observation station reported that, about 10 minutes before the accident, the wind was from 290° at 7 knots. The airplane was departing from runway 31. The Federal Aviation Administration's Airplane Flying Handbook, FAA-H-8083-3B, "Normal Takeoff," stated, in part: As the airplane gains speed, the elevator control tends to assume a neutral position if the airplane is correctly trimmed. At the same time, the rudder pedals are used to keep the nose of the airplane pointed down the runway and parallel to the centerline. The effects of engine torque and P-factor at the initial speeds tend to pull the nose to the left (Torque and P-Factor will be discussed in greater detail in later chapter). The pilot must use whatever rudder pressure is needed to correct for these effects or winds.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during takeoff defining event
  2. Runway excursion during takeoff
  3. Landing gear collapse during takeoff

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Student/instructed pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Instructor/check pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 368 hours in all; 310 in this make and model; 86 in the last 90 days; 25 in the last 30 days; 234 as pilot in command; 110 on instruments
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 6 hours in all; 6 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 15,896.9 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, February 13, 2019
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,450 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-360-L2A (piston); 7,908 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: MMU Morristown NJ at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: MMU Morristown NJ
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 31, 3,997 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 290° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 25,000 ft
  • Temperature: 50°F (10°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.96 inHg
  • Observation at 9:50 pm from KMMU

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

4 documents, released by the NTSB on March 27, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.