The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB GAA15CA005 · Final report

Cessna 208B accident near Muskegon, Michigan, March 10, 2015

On March 10, 2015 at about 11:40 am local time, a 1996 Cessna 208B, registered N12155, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (IFR final approach) near Muskegon, Michigan (Muskegon County Airport). It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's improper decision to continue the landing when the airplane was not in a safe position to land, resulting in the collision with ground-based approach lighting.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 10, 2015 · about 11:40 am local time · cases in 2015
Place
Muskegon, Michigan · Muskegon County Airport · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cessna 208B, built 1996 · all 208Bs on the register
Registration
N12155 · registry record · serial 208B0562
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he flew an autopilot coupled approach to minimums in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The pilot exited IMC at the decision height, disconnected the autopilot, and the approach lights became visible. The pilot determined he was right of the runway and as he maneuvered to realign the airplane with the runway, he struck elements of the approach light system. A postaccident examination revealed the airplane sustained substantial damage to the horizontal stabilizer. Effective at the time of this accident was a permanent Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) associated with the ILS runway 24 approach prohibiting a coupled autopilot approach from 1150 feet mean seal level to the surface. During a post-accident interview the pilot stated he was unaware of this NOTAM. The NOTAM had been in effect since February 21st, 2014 and the approach chart used did not note this approach restriction. Weather at the time of the accident was reported as winds from 250 degrees at 5 knots, ½ statute mile visibility, 200 feet overcast, temperature 32 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 32 degrees Fahrenheit, and altimeter 30.04 inches of mercury. The pilot reported no preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Altitude deviation during approach (IFR final approach)
  2. Attempted remediation/recovery during approach (IFR final approach)
  3. Abrupt maneuver during approach (IFR final approach) defining event
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (IFR final approach)
  5. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Heading/course › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › Runway/taxi/approach light › Contributed to outcome
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of available resources › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: glider
  • Flight time: 8,316 hours in all; 5,350 in this make and model; 19 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days; 8,020 as pilot in command; 1,649 on instruments
  • Last flight review: November 7, 2014
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 11,243 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, March 3, 2015
  • Maximum gross weight: 8,750 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Pratt and Whitney PT6A-114A (turboprop); 10,976 hours total
  • Operator: Martinaire Aviation, L.L.C.

The flight

  • Departed from: KLAN Lansing MI at 10:52 am
  • Destination: KMKG Muskegon MI
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 24, 6,501 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 210° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 0.5 statute miles
  • Temperature: 34°F (1°C), dew point 34°F (1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 am from KMKG

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on May 26, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/GAA15CA005.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.