The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA26LA122 · Final report

Hughes 269A accident near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, February 21, 2026

On February 21, 2026 at about 4:59 pm local time, a 1966 Hughes 269A (helicopter), registered N1020S, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (None airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The flight instructor’s failure to identify the excess power required to lift off from soft and muddy ground, which resulted in a loss of control and subsequent collision with a hangar during takeoff.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 21, 2026 · about 4:59 pm local time
Place
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania · None · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Hughes 269A UNDESIGNAT, built 1966 · all 269As on the register
Registration
N1020S · registry record · serial 26-0467
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot and the flight instructor performed a preflight inspection of the helicopter and then moved it from the hangar onto an area of soft, muddy ground outside. They pushed the helicopter as far away from the hangar as they could due to the soft ground, about 25 to 30 ft. The student pilot described that where the helicopter was positioned, it was “leaning back” with the aft portion of both skids several inches deep in the mud. During the subsequent takeoff attempt, the student pilot noted that the helicopter required the application of additional engine power than he had observed during previous takeoffs before it became “light on the skids.” During a postaccident interview, he postulated that the helicopter might have been “stuck in the mud.” The flight instructor then felt that the helicopter’s tail might strike the ground, so he nudged the cyclic control forward. Immediately after, the helicopter began moving forward toward the hangar in a significantly nose low attitude. Despite their subsequent control inputs, neither pilot was able to arrest the helicopter’s forward motion and it struck the hangar less than 2 seconds later and came to rest on its right side. The helicopter’s fuselage, tailboom, and main rotor blades were substantially damaged during the accident sequence. The flight instructor reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the helicopter that would have precluded normal operation, and FAA inspectors who examined the helicopter after the accident were unable to find evidence of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure of the flight controls that would have precluded normal operation. Based on this information, it is likely that the helicopter suddenly dislodged itself from the soft, muddy ground during the takeoff when the flight instructor applied nose down cyclic input, which resulted in an unexpected, rapid forward movement and collision with the hangar. Had the flight instructor recognized the abnormal amount of engine power being applied by the student and discontinued the takeoff attempt, it is likely that the accident could have been avoided.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during takeoff
  2. Loss of control on ground during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Instructor/check pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: instructor: helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 7,544 hours in all; 628 in this make and model; 79 in the last 90 days; 28 in the last 30 days; 7,420 as pilot in command; 1,753 on instruments
  • Last flight review: February 5, 2026
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: minor injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 62 hours in all; 34 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 11 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,618.9 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 17, 2025
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,670 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming HIO-360-B1A (piston); 263 hours total
  • Operator: Tactical Turtle LLC

The flight

  • Destination: W05 Gettysburg PA
  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 320° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 39°F (4°C), dew point 32°F (0°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 11:54 am from KRSP, 14 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KRSP 211654Z AUTO 32007KT 260V020 10SM CLR 04/00 A2995 RMK AO2

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Photographs from the investigation 3 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on June 25, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.