The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA24LA334 · Final report

Aeronca 7AC accident near Topsham, Maine, June 16, 2024

On June 16, 2024 at about 2:30 pm local time, a 1947 Aeronca 7AC, registered N3854E, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Topsham, Maine. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power due to carburetor icing as a result of the pilot’s delayed application of carburetor heat.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 16, 2024 · about 2:30 pm local time
Place
Topsham, Maine · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Aeronca 7AC, built 1947 · all 7ACs on the register
Registration
N3854E · registry record · serial 7AC-7094
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot was on a local flight following an annual inspection. For the first 45 minutes of flight, the pilot remained in the traffic pattern where he operated from a grass runway. He then departed the airport traffic pattern and then flew at about 1,500 ft above ground level (agl) over rivers and open water for another 45 minutes. He began a climbing 180° turn back toward the airport at full power when the engine lost partial power. The pilot attempted to troubleshoot the loss of engine power by applying carburetor heat and manipulating the throttle without success. He was unable to maintain altitude and, with no desirable locations available to land, the pilot executed a forced landing to a river, which resulted in substantial damage to the left wing. The airplane was recovered from the river and a postaccident examination of the airplane’s fuel system and engine was conducted. Water was present in the fuel system and disassembly of the engine’s carburetor revealed a “white gummy substance” throughout the unit that was blocking the main fuel jet. There were no other mechanical malfunctions or anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. A sample of the unknown substance from the fuel system was analyzed and found to most likely be a plant or other naturally occurring cellulosic material. A review of the maintenance logbooks for the airplane revealed that the fuel tank was emptied and flushed about one month before the accident, during the most recent annual inspection. The fuel strainer, carburetor inlet screen, carburetor bowl was “inspected and cleaned” at the same time. According to the owner, this inspection and cleaning was the result of a fuel contamination issue following the restoration of the airplane. Considering that the carburetor was inspected and cleaned during the annual inspection, just a month before the accident, and that the engine had operated normally for about 90 minutes of flight, it is likely that the contamination found in the carburetor was the result of the water immersion in the river. The temperature and dew point at the time of the accident were conducive to the formation of serious icing at glide engine power settings. Considering that the airplane operated from a grass runway and flew at low altitudes over rivers and open water for about 90 minutes, it is likely that the airplane encountered higher relative humidity than anticipated, which resulted in a partial loss of engine power due to carburetor icing. Additionally, because the pilot did not activate the carburetor heat until after the engine had begun losing power, the likelihood that the icing could be remediated and engine power restored was substantially reduced.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Ditching during emergency descent
  2. Fuel related during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Decision related to condition
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Delayed action › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 1,592 hours in all; 25 in this make and model; 2 in the last 90 days; 1,086 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: November 5, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Sport Pilot
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,562 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 6, 2024; 1.5 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,220 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental Aerospace Technolo A-65 (piston); 40 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: BXM Brunswick ME at 1:15 pm
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 66°F (19°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.26 inHg
  • Observation at 10:53 am from IWI, 7 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KIWI 161453Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM CLR 19/06 A3026 RMK AO2 SLP248 T01940056 51003=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA24LA334.