Amateur-built RV-6 accident near Milton, Florida, February 6, 2023
On February 6, 2023 at about 8:32 pm local time, a 1998 amateur-built RV-6, registered N330PC, was substantially damaged in an accident during initial climb near Milton, Florida (Peter Prince Fld airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The incorrect installation of the fuel pickups, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing was the lack of documentation of the airplane’s unusable fuel.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- February 6, 2023 · about 8:32 pm local time
- Place
- Milton, Florida · Peter Prince Fld · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built RV-6, built 1998
- Registration
- N330PC · no longer on the register · serial 23330
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
After having a condition inspection of the experimental amateur-built airplane completed, the pilot reported performing a thorough preflight inspection, checking both fuel tanks for contamination with none noted. The left wing fuel tank contained about 7 gallons of 100LL aviation fuel and the right wing fuel tank was almost full. The preflight inspection, engine start, and run-up were normal. During initial climb, the engine sustained a total loss of power. The pilot pushed the nose over and attempted a left turn to return to the airport. The engine regained power shortly before the airplane impacted the ground and a fuel truck, resulting in substantial damage. Postaccident examination of the engine found no evidence of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the wing fuel tanks revealed that the fuel pickups in both wing fuel tanks were installed incorrectly as compared to the kit manufacturer’s plans; both lines were facing forward instead of aft. The incorrect positioning of the pickup lines made it likely that the amount of unusable fuel was greatly increased, especially at nose high pitch attitudes, such as during takeoff and initial climb, due to the fuel’s movement toward the aft portion of the tank. The pilot reported that he was not provided documentation when he bought the airplane as to the quantity of unusable fuel, nor had the unusable fuel amounts been calculated since he purchased the airplane. A review of maintenance records showed that the kit manufacturer’s service bulletin and a service notification letter relating to fuel pickups had not been complied with. While compliance was not mandatory, if the service bulletin and service letter had been complied with, it is possible that the incorrect fuel pickup orientation would have been identified. Although the amount of unusable fuel in the selected tank selected could not be determined (given the damage sustained to the tank during the accident), it is likely that during initial climb the engine was starved for fuel due to the incorrect installation of the pickup lines, resulting in a loss of engine power.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during post (impact)
- Fuel starvation during initial climb defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Owner/builder
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Knowledge › Transfer of knowledge › Owner/builder
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Knowledge › Knowledge of equipment › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel distribution › Incorrect service/maintenance
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot, flight instructor, flight engineer
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 11,225 hours in all; 400 in this make and model; 41 in the last 90 days; 4 in the last 30 days; 5,194 as pilot in command; 668 on instruments
- Last flight review: May 4, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: serious injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 723.5 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, January 25, 2023; 0 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 1,600 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming IO-360-B1B (piston); 2,463 hours total
The flight
- Destination: 18FD Baker FL
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 18, 3,701 ft by 75 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: at 4 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: a few clouds at 1,000 ft
- Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
- Altimeter: 30.15 inHg
- Observation at 1:56 pm from NSE, 5 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KNSE 061956Z VRB04KT 10SM FEW010 22/07 A3015 RMK AO2 SLP196 FU FEW010 FU NW-NE T02220067 $
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
19 documents, released by the NTSB on May 2, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
