The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA23FA280 · Final report

Piper PA-32R-300 accident near North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, July 2, 2023

On July 2, 2023 at about 3:02 pm local time, a 1976 Piper PA-32R-300, registered N5524F, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (Grand Strand Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 5 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s loss of control during initial climb, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and impact with terrain. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s operation of the airplane above its maximum gross weight and near its aft center of gravity limit, which reduced its climb performance and degraded its handling qualities.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 2, 2023 · about 3:02 pm local time
Place
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina · Grand Strand Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
5 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-32R-300 NO SERIES, built 1976 · all PA-32R-300s on the register
Registration
N5524F · no longer on the register · serial 32R-7780013
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

A witness reported the airplane appeared to have difficulty gaining altitude after takeoff. He stated the engine sounded muffled and underpowered, and the airplane exhibited a high angle of attack with minimal altitude gain. He saw the airplane enter a slow right turn before the right wing dropped and the airplane descended rapidly in a right turn. The airplane collided with trees and terrain on a golf course and was consumed by postimpact fire. The witness statement, debris path, and impact signatures were consistent with a loss of control and aerodynamic stall. During a postaccident examination of the wreckage, flight control continuity was confirmed. The fuel selector was found in the off position; however, fuel was present in the engine-driven fuel pump, fuel servo, and flow divider, therefore impact forces likely resulted in the as-found position of the fuel selector. The engine crankshaft rotated freely and the cylinders displayed normal compression, suction, and valve operation. Overall, the postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airframe or engine. The airplane was topped off with fuel two days before the accident, and there was no evidence to indicate that additional flights were conducted between that refueling and the accident flight. The combined weight of the fuel, occupants, and luggage indicated that the airplane was likely operating above its maximum gross weight and near its aft center of gravity (CG) limit at the time of the accident. Additionally, the reported weather conditions about the time of the accident resulted in a calculated density altitude of about 2,000 ft. Given this information, the airplane’s overweight condition and the slightly elevated density altitude likely resulted in the airplane’s degraded climb performance during the initial climb, as described by the witness. Additionally, the airplane’s aftward CG loading likely degraded its handling characteristics and contributed to the pilot’s loss of control during initial climb.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Aerodynamic stall/spin during initial climb defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  3. Aircraft loading event during prior to flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Weight/balance calculations › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › CG/weight distribution › Capability exceeded
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Aircraft capability › Maximum weight › Capability exceeded

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 1,620 hours in all; 1,620 in this make and model; 35 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: BasicMed (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

Passenger

  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 27, 2022; 4,272 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-540-K1G5D (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 200° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 2,600 ft
  • Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.02 inHg
  • Observation at 11:15 am from HYW, 7 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KHYW 021515Z AUTO 20004KT 10SM SCT026 30/23 A3002 RMK AO2

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers4

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

13 documents, released by the NTSB on July 22, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.