Cessna 172 accident near Akron, Ohio, July 4, 2022
On July 4, 2022 at about 11:01 pm local time, a 1973 Cessna 172, registered N12115, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (descent) near Akron, Ohio (Akron Fulton Intl airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilots’ improper preflight fuel planning and in-flight fuel management, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 4, 2022 · about 11:01 pm local time
- Place
- Akron, Ohio · Akron Fulton Intl · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were seriously injured.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 172 M, built 1973 · all 172s on the register
- Registration
- N12115 · registry record · serial 17261818
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot fueled the airplane before takeoff on the last leg of the cross-country flight. As he began the descent toward his home airport, the pilot noted that the fuel gauges were indicating lower than he had ever observed them to be. Shortly after he turned to a nearby airport to purchase additional fuel, the engine stopped producing power. During the forced landing, the airplane’s landing gear impacted trees, and the airplane descended nose-first to the ground, substantially damaging the fuselage and right wing. Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of fuel in the fuel tanks, fuel lines, or carburetor. No preimpact anomalies or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation were observed. Fuel calculations for the takeoff and cruise portions of the accident flight revealed that between about 2 and 6 gallons of fuel could have remained at the time of the accident; however, these calculations did not account for improper fuel mixture leaning or fuel used during start, taxi, and run-up. Given that the pilot did not lean the mixture during the cross-country flight, it is likely the airplane’s fuel supply had been completely exhausted, resulting in the total loss of engine power. Had appropriate preflight fuel planning and inflight fuel monitoring been performed by the pilot, the fuel exhaustion likely would have been prevented.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Fuel exhaustion during enroute (descent) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during approach
- Loss of control in flight during approach
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: left
- Injury: serious injuries
Passenger
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: serious injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,324.2 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, June 11, 2022; 9.4 hours since
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-320-E2D (piston); 4,348 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: 45PN Tunkhannock PA at 8:30 pm
- Destination: 15G Wadsworth OH
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 210° at 9 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 86°F (30°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
- Altimeter: 30.10 inHg
- Observation at 6:54 pm from AKR, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KAKR 042254Z AUTO 21009KT 10SM CLR 30/13 A3010 RMK AO2 SLP185 T03000133
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
17 documents, released by the NTSB on November 15, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Memorandum of Record - No 6120.1 Form Received | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot Statement | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Witness Statements | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 4 | FAA Inspector Statements | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Fuel Receipts | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Memorandum of Record - Fuel Calculations | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Excerpts from Owner's Manual | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Airplane Maintenance Logbook Entries | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Fuel Selector Gasket Invoice | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Meteorology - Winds Aloft Information | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 11 | Photographs | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 12 | ADS-B Tabular Data | spreadsheet | Download |
| 13 | Flight Track Plot | map file | Download |
| 14 | Wreckage Examination Summary | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 15 | Memorandum for Record A�� Mechanic Questions | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 16 | Party Forms | PDF, 10 pages | View Download |
| 17 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
