Mooney M20M accident near Tampa, Florida, November 15, 2021
On November 15, 2021 at about 3:12 pm local time, a 2000 Mooney M20M, registered N21890, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern base) near Tampa, Florida (Peter O Knight airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The total loss of engine power due to the failure of maintenance personnel to properly tighten the fuel supply line b-nut at the manifold valve during installation.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- November 15, 2021 · about 3:12 pm local time
- Place
- Tampa, Florida · Peter O Knight · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Mooney M20M NO SERIES, built 2000 · all M20Ms on the register
- Registration
- N21890 · no longer on the register · serial 27-0293
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
While in cruise flight, the pilot noticed the turbine inlet temperature (TIT) was about 100° F above the maximum reading and that liquid was on the windshield. He reduced engine power, which lowered the TIT reading and then diverted to his home airport. While on the base leg of the airport traffic pattern at 1,200 ft above gound level, he advanced the throttle, but the engine did not respond. At 800 ft msl he noted he would be unable to reach the airport and ditched the airplane. Both occupants exited the airplane and were transported to land, and the airplane’s fuselage was substantially damaged during the ditching. Following recovery of the airplane, the inlet fuel line at the manifold valve was 7.5 flats of the b-nut from being hand tight against the inlet fitting. There was no provision for safety wiring the b-nut and there was no torque stripe on the b-nut or inlet fitting. Fuel leakage was noted at the loose b-nut during pressure testing, but no leakage occurred after tightening the b-nut. There was no damage to the b-nut or fitting that would have precluded obtaining the proper torque. The manifold valve was overhauled and installed nearly 2 months earlier. The mechanic who signed off the installation indicated he normally would have applied a torque stripe on the b-nut. Based on this information, it is likely that the overheating of the engine and the subsequent loss of engine power was likely due to a fuel leak at the fuel manifold valve, resulting an excessively lean fuel to air mixture. It is also likely that the loose b-nut had not been properly tightened during the reinstallation of the manifold valve.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Miscellaneous/other during enroute (cruise)
- Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern base) defining event
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
- Ditching during emergency descent
- Aircraft maintenance event during prior to flight
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine fuel and control › Fuel distribution › Incorrect service/maintenance
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 2,483 hours in all; 1,294 in this make and model; 10.9 in the last 90 days; 3.5 in the last 30 days; 2,410 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: May 7, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 1,229 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, July 13, 2021
- Maximum gross weight: 3,200 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming TIO-540-AF1B (piston); 1,229 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: LAL Lakeland FL at 2:38 pm
- Destination: GNV Gainesville FL
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 020° at 8 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 10,000 ft
- Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
- Altimeter: 30.22 inHg
- Observation at 10:15 am from KTPF, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KTPF 151515Z AUTO 02008KT 10SM BKN100 BKN120 18/06 A3022 RMK AO2=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
6 documents, released by the NTSB on September 7, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 12 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Record of NTSB Conversations | PDF, 17 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Excerpts from Maintenance Records | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 4 | Memorandum for Record - NTSB Virtual Engine Examination | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Investigative Photographs | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
