The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24LA061 · Final report

Cessna 421C accident near Mcgregor, Texas, December 8, 2023

On December 8, 2023 at about 6:32 pm local time, a 1978 Cessna 421C, registered N146TJ, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (climb to cruise) near Mcgregor, Texas. It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of the spring pin in the right propeller governor, which precluded the pilot from controlling the propeller pitch to maintain engine rpm, resulting in a loss of engine thrust, excessive drag, and the subsequent forced landing to a field.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 8, 2023 · about 6:32 pm local time
Place
Mcgregor, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 421C, built 1978 · all 421Cs on the register
Registration
N146TJ · registry record · serial 421C0500
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

As the airplane climbed through about 11,500 ft, the right engine speed increased suddenly from about 2,200 rpm to about 4,500 rpm, and the pilot thought that the right propeller governor had failed. He pulled back the right propeller condition lever, which resulted in no change, so he pulled the right engine mixture control back to near cutoff, which reduced the engine speed to about 2,000 rpm. The right engine continued to run, and the pilot initiated a turn back toward the departure airport; however, the airplane could not maintain altitude as he expected. The pilot declared an emergency and, after determining that the airplane would not make it to the airport or a closer one, he performed a forced, gear-up landing into a flat, harvested corn field. The airplane came to rest upright, sustaining substantial damage to the lower fuselage. After the accident, the right engine was placed in a test cell; the engine started without issue. Examination of the right propeller blades and hub assembly revealed evidence that the blade angles were on or near the low pitch stop at ground impact; the propeller was not feathered. No mechanical anomaly was identified with the right propeller hub that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the right propeller governor revealed that the steel spring pin that held the pilot spool in place had fractured in shear overload into multiple pieces. Although mechanical interference between the pilot spool and one (or more) of the parts that rotate about it could impart shear loads on the spring pin, the investigation identified no evidence of metal fatigue, binding, or interference from foreign material. Thus, the reason for the failure of the spring pin was not determined. During the accident flight, when the spring pin failed, it precluded the pilot from controlling the propeller pitch to maintain engine rpm. It also allowed the propeller to move to low pitch, which resulted in excessive drag that further degraded the performance characteristics of the airplane.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail during enroute (climb to cruise) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Propeller system › Propeller governor › Failure
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Powerplant parameters › Attain/maintain not possible
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Attain/maintain not possible

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot, military
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 11,000 hours in all; 79 in this make and model; 88 in the last 90 days; 35 in the last 30 days; 10,450 as pilot in command; 450 on instruments
  • Last flight review: June 20, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,020 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 15, 2023
  • Maximum gross weight: 7,450 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental GTSIO-520-L (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental GTSIO-520-L (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Birdboys2 Aviation LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: ACT Waco TX at 6:15 pm
  • Destination: 5C1 Boerne TX
  • Flight plan: IFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 190° at 15 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 2,600 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.80 inHg
  • Observation at 11:55 am from ACT, 23 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KACT 081755Z 19015KT 10SM SCT026 23/16 A2980 RMK AO2 T02280161

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

8 documents, released by the NTSB on November 5, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.