The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN24FA046 · Final report

Socata TBM 700 accident near Ludington, Michigan, November 26, 2023

On November 26, 2023 at about 3:00 pm local time, a 2008 Socata TBM 700, registered N850JH, was destroyed in an accident during standing near Ludington, Michigan (Mason County Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s decision to take off with ice/snow contamination on the airplane’s wings, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and impact with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 26, 2023 · about 3:00 pm local time · cases in 2023
Place
Ludington, Michigan · Mason County Airport · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Socata TBM 700, built 2008 · all TBM 700s on the register
Registration
N850JH · registry record · serial 448
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane was removed from an unheated hangar during a period of moderate snowfall. About 15 minutes later, the instrument-rated pilot taxied the airplane to the runway for departure, with visible snow accumulation on the ground and on the airplane wings, and horizontal stabilizer. The airplane was equipped with wing surface deice boots; however, deice boots are used to dislodge ice that may accumulate while in flight. According to the airplane’s pilot operating handbook, all snow, frost, and ice must be removed from all wing and control surfaces during the preflight inspection. On icy or snow-covered runways, anti-icing fluid must be sprayed on the wings, control surfaces and in landing gear wells, shortly before take-off. The risks of snow and ice accumulation on control surfaces were further outlined in a 2018 service letter (SL) from the airplane manufacturer, which stated that takeoffs with snow or ice adhering to the wings should not be attempted because this could drastically affect performance due to the reduced aerodynamic lift and increased drag resulting from disturbed airflow. The SL further provided the appropriate recommendations to assist the operator in checking proper implementation of on ground de-icing or anti-icing procedures. The departure airport did not offer de-icing or anti-icing services. The airport manager, who watched the airplane take off, said the departure appeared to be normal until the left wing dropped shortly after rotation. Another witness said that the airplane was loud and low. She said the airplane was in a left-wing-low attitude before it cleared a line of trees and then impacted the ground. The airplane was destroyed by impact forces and a postimpact fire. The impact and fire damage precluded functional testing of the flight controls, and related systems. Signatures on the engine and propeller were consistent with power and rotation at the time of the accident. Examination of the wreckage did not reveal preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operations. The left wing dropping during the climb was likely the result of snow accumulation on the airplane surfaces; the reduced aerodynamic lift and increased drag resulted in an aerodynamic stall and loss of control during the attempted climb after takeoff.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during takeoff
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  3. Structural icing during standing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Preflight inspection › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Airspeed › Not attained/maintained
  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Snow › Decision related to condition

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 4,700 hours in all; 320 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: April 20, 2023
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,750 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,660 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 7, 2023
  • Maximum gross weight: 6,579 lb
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Pratt and Whitney PT6A-66D (turboprop); 1,660 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: LDM Ludington MI at 3:00 pm
  • Destination: ANQ Angola IN
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 08, 5,003 ft by 75 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 140° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 0 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 400 ft
  • Temperature: 30°F (-1°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.82 inHg
  • Observation at 9:55 am from KLDM, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KLDM 261455Z AUTO 14003KT 3/4SM -SN OVC004 M01/M01 A2982 RMK AO2 P0001 60001 T10061012

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Photographs from the investigation 7 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

11 documents, released by the NTSB on November 5, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Photos PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
2 Meteorology Specialist's Factual Report PDF, 10 pages · our copy View Download
3 Witness Statements PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
4 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
5 Wreckage Examination Summary PDF, 5 pages · our copy View Download
6 Maintenance Records PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
7 Service Letter PDF, 8 pages · our copy View Download
8 Flight Instructor Statement PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
9 Pilot Operating Handbook PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download
10 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 2 pages · our copy View Download
11 Party Form PDF, 1 page · our copy View Download

The same docket at the NTSB.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/CEN24FA046.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.