Beech B23 accident near Lamesa, Texas, October 2, 2021
On October 2, 2021 at about 5:25 pm local time, a 1968 Beech B23, registered N6996Q, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Lamesa, Texas (Lamesa Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The loss of engine power for a reason that could not be determined.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- October 2, 2021 · about 5:25 pm local time
- Place
- Lamesa, Texas · Lamesa Muni · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Beech B23, built 1968 · all B23s on the register
- Registration
- N6996Q · no longer on the register · serial M-1103
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The airplane was on the first flight following an annual inspection in which the carburetor had been changed along with other maintenance. The pilot reported that, during the preflight inspection, both fuel tanks were full and everything was normal except for a non-working rotating beacon. She reported that the engine started normally, and the engine checks were normal except that the engine rpms were slightly lower than before the carburetor replacement. The pilot performed one takeoff and landing without difficulty. On the ensuing takeoff, when the airplane reached the departure threshold, the engine power reduced to idle. The pilot made a forced landing in a field and the airplane sustained substantial damage to the right wing. The pilot reported that she did not use carburetor heat during the takeoff or landing because the temperature was above 75° F and the humidity was low; however, the temperature and dewpoint recorded at the accident airport were favorable for serious carburetor icing at glide power settings. Postaccident examination revealed that the fuel selector valve was not in a detent and was positioned between the left and off positions. The pilot stated she did not move the fuel selector valve during or after the flight. Investigators were unable to determine when the fuel selector valve was moved to this position. The postaccident examination also revealed that a cotter pin was not installed on the nut and bolt that secured the throttle cable to the carburetor throttle arm; however, the nut and bolt were still in their proper position and finger tight and did not prevent normal operation of the throttle. The right fuel tank was found full of fuel and the left tank was empty after the accident. The fuel tanks were not compromised and no leaks were noted. The reason the left fuel tank was empty when the pilot had verified it was full before the flight could not be determined. No other mechanical discrepancies were found that would have prevented normal operation. Based on the available information, the loss of engine power could have been the result of improper fuel selector positioning, which reduced fuel flow and starved the engine for fuel, fuel starvation due to inadequate fuel supply from the left fuel tank, or the pilot’s failure to use carburetor heat during the flight when conditions were conducive for serious carburetor icing. The reason for the loss of engine power could not be determined due to the multiple possibilities discovered during postaccident examination.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of engine power (partial) during maneuvering defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Effect on equipment
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel selector/shutoff valve › Incorrect use/operation
- Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 107 hours in all; 67 in this make and model; 1 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days; 55 as pilot in command; 0 on instruments
- Last flight review: August 29, 2020
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,157 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, August 9, 2021
- Maximum gross weight: 2,455 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-360-A2G (piston); 3,157 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: LUV Lamesa TX
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 72°F (22°C), dew point 55°F (13°C)
- Altimeter: 30.19 inHg
- Observation at 12:35 pm from KLUV
Weather report (METAR): METAR KLUV 021735Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM 22/13 A3019 RMK AO2=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on August 16, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Maintenance Record Excerpts | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Pilot Logbook Excerpts | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 4 | METAR Reports for Kluv | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Carburetor Icing Probability Chart | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | Record of Conversation with FAA Inspector | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Photos | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
