Amateur-built LANCAIR SUPER ES accident near Ely, Minnesota, August 21, 2020
On August 21, 2020 at about 4:06 am local time, a 2010 amateur-built LANCAIR SUPER ES, registered N997S, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Ely, Minnesota (Ely Municipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The non-instrument rated pilot’s improper decision to attempt flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation and loss of control and subsequent impact with terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- August 21, 2020 · about 4:06 am local time
- Place
- Ely, Minnesota · Ely Municipal Airport · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built LANCAIR SUPER ES No Series, built 2010
- Registration
- N997S · no longer on the register · serial ES-121
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The non-instrument rated private pilot delayed his departure to wait for fog to clear at the planned destination airport, which was located about 58 miles east of the departure airport. Enroute instrument meteorological conditions were forecast at the time of the accident. Radar track data showed that, after takeoff, the airplane proceeded on a northeasterly track from the departure airport and made several turns at a low altitude, which was indicative of the pilot’s attempt to maintain visual reference by avoiding enroute weather at night. The track kept the pilot near the city of Ely and developed areas around White Iron Lake, and avoided a prohibited area further north and to the east that required a minimum overflight altitude of 4,000 ft msl. Witnesses near the accident site location saw the airplane descend, then climb into a cloud layer, and then descend into terrain. Postaccident examination of recovered airframe components revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. The pilot had received airplane instrument flight instruction toward an instrument rating. The pilot’s flight instructor reported that the pilot was not ready for flight in instrument meteorological conditions and was “nowhere near ready for a [instrument rating] checkride.” The non-instrument rated pilot’s flight in dark night conditions in an area of sparse cultural lighting, with clouds in the vicinity of the airplane’s reported path was conducive to the development of spatial disorientation and loss of control.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during enroute defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not attained/maintained
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Effect on personnel
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 400 hours in all
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 358.7 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, November 26, 2019
- Maximum gross weight: 3,200 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Teledyne Continental Motors IO-550-N19B (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: ELO Ely MN at 4:01 pm
- Destination: CKC Grand Marais MN
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: night, dark
- Wind: from 140° at 8 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 4,100 ft; scat at 3,200 ft
- Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
- Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
- Observation at 4:15 am from ELO, 5 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
13 documents, released by the NTSB on June 17, 2022. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Record of Conversation - Elo Airport Manager | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 2 | FAA Witness Statement - Amos | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 3 | FAA Witness Statement - Davies | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Witness Statement - Becca and Joselyn | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Record of Correspondence - FAA | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 6 | radar Playback | video | View Download |
| 7 | radar Track Data | data file | Download |
| 8 | Memorandum of Record - Wreckage and Impact Information | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 9 | Memorandum - Medical and Pathological Information | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 10 | Memorandum - Meteorological Information | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 11 | Elo Metars | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 12 | Photo Log | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 13 | Toxicological Report - FAA | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
