The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN17LA047 · Final report

Cessna Citation 500 accident near Gunnison, Colorado, December 5, 2016

On December 5, 2016 at about 1:53 am local time, a 1975 Cessna Citation 500, registered N332SE, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Gunnison, Colorado (Gunnison-Crested Butte Airport). It was a business flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to fly a stabilized approach and his inadequate landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to ensure that the airplane was properly serviced with fuel before departing on the flight.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 12, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
December 5, 2016 · about 1:53 am local time · cases in 2016
Place
Gunnison, Colorado · Gunnison-Crested Butte Airport · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna Citation 500, built 1975
Registration
N332SE · no longer on the register · serial 500-0332
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot of the jet reported that he initially requested that 100 lbs of fuel be added to both fuel tanks. During the subsequent preflight inspection, the pilot decided that more fuel was needed, so he requested that the airplane's fuel tanks be topped off with fuel. However, he did not confirm the fuel levels or check the fuel gauges before takeoff. He departed on the flight and did not check the fuel gauges until about 1 hour after takeoff. He stated that, at that time, the fuel gauges were showing about 900-1,000 lbs of fuel per side, and he realized that the fuel tanks had not been topped off as requested. He reduced engine power to conserve fuel and to increase the airplane's flight endurance while he continued to his destination. When the fuel gauges showed about 400-500 lbs of fuel per side, the low fuel lights for both wing fuel tanks illuminated. The pilot reported to air traffic control that the airplane was low on fuel and diverted the flight to the nearest airport. The pilot reported that the airplane was high and fast on the visual approach for landing. He misjudged the height above the ground and later stated that the airplane "landed very hard." The airplane's left main landing gear and nose gear collapsed and the airplane veered off the runway, resulting in substantial damage to the left wing. The pilot reported no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event
  2. Runway excursion during landing (flare/touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • factor Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid level other cases naming the fuel system
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Planning/preparation › Fuel planning › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,267 hours in all; 142 in this make and model; 22 in the last 90 days; 11 in the last 30 days; 1,703 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,218 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, August 31, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 11,850 lb
  • Seats: 8
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: P&W JT-15D-1A (turbofan); 5,218 hours total
  • Engine 2: P&W JT-15D-1A (turbofan); 5,218 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: SJC San Jose CA at 11:16 pm
  • Destination: PUB Pueblo CO
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 24, 9,400 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 340° at 4 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 7,500 ft
  • Temperature: 18°F (-8°C), dew point 9°F (-13°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.07 inHg
  • Observation at 1:56 am from GUC

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 6 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on April 20, 2017. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/CEN17LA047.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.