The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN12LA661 · Final report

Lake LA4 accident near Kenosha, Wisconsin, September 27, 2012

On September 27, 2012 at about 7:30 pm local time, a Lake LA4, registered N1127L, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff near Kenosha, Wisconsin (Kenosha Regional airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined because examination and test run of the engine did not reveal any anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 27, 2012 · about 7:30 pm local time
Place
Kenosha, Wisconsin · Kenosha Regional · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Lake LA4 · all LA4s on the register
Registration
N1127L · registry record · serial 289
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The accident flight was the airplane’s first flight after its annual maintenance inspection was completed. The pilot stated that the pretakeoff engine run-up was normal; however, during the takeoff, the engine started to "sputter”; the pilot continued the flight straight ahead, but the engine subsequently lost total power, and the pilot performed a forced landing to a grassy area. Examination and test run of the engine did not reveal any abnormalities that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during takeoff defining event
  2. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 1,223 hours in all; 725 in this make and model; 6 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 1,089 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: October 28, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,999 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 17, 2012
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A1A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: KENW Kenosha WI
  • Destination: KLOT Romeoville IL
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 07R, 5,499 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 060° at 11 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 4,600 ft; a few clouds at 2,500 ft
  • Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.20 inHg
  • Observation at 7:32 pm from KENW

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.