Cessna 172M and Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300/LC mid-air collision near Fort Morgan, Colorado, August 31, 2025
On August 31, 2025 at about 4:40 pm local time, 2 aircraft, Cessna 172M (N61657) and Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300/LC (N330AN), were involved in a mid-air collision near Fort Morgan, Colorado (Fort Morgan Muni airport). 1 person was killed, 1 person was seriously injured and 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 12, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- August 31, 2025 · about 4:40 pm local time · cases in 2025
- Place
- Fort Morgan, Colorado · Fort Morgan Muni · cases near this airport · map
- Type
- Accident · mid-air collision
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed, 1 person was seriously injured and 2 people had minor injuries.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft 1
- Cessna 172M, built 1975 · all 172Ms on the register
- Registration
- N61657 · registry record · serial 17264706
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
- Aircraft 2
- Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300/LC, built 2015 · all EA 300/LCs on the register
- Registration
- N330AN · no longer on the register · serial LC051
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative for the Cessna 172M preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record
On August 31, 2025, about 1040 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172M, N61657, and an Extra Flugzeugproduktions-UND EA 300/LC, N330AN, were both destroyed when they collided midair near Fort Morgan, Colorado. The pilot and safety pilot of the Cessna received minor injuries. The pilot of the Extra 300 was seriously injured, and the safety pilot of the Extra 300 was fatally injured. Both airplanes were operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flights. According to the pilot of the Cessna, he was conducting instrument flight training with the assistance of a safety pilot. They were performing the RNAV GPS approach to runway 14 at Fort Morgan Municipal Airport (FMM) Fort Morgan, Colorado, while in visual flight rules (VFR) conditions. The pilot had made multiple radio calls on the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) to notify the FMM traffic of his arrival and was aware of aerobatic flights occurring at the airport. He recalled hearing two airplanes in the traffic pattern and understood that one may have landed. The pilot then continued the instrument approach to the decision altitude of 4,845 ft mean sea level, or about 250 ft above ground level (agl), then removed his view limiting device. He identified the runway and continued the approach visually. The pilot estimated that they were over the threshold when he heard a bang and felt a forward and downward acceleration. After the impact the two pilots immediately exited the airplane. According to the pilot of the Extra 300, he was competing in an aerobatic competition over the airport and completed his sequence. He exited the box and maneuvered to enter the traffic pattern at the traffic pattern altitude. He made multiple radio calls stating his intention to land on runway 14. He heard a previous competitor on the CTAF who would be landing before him, but no one else. While on the downwind leg, he entered a continuous left descending turn to the runway. He was on final approach and about ready to begin the flare when the Cessna appeared underneath the nose of the Extra 300. The impact happened quickly afterwards and there was no time for maneuvering or go around. According to a competition judge, located about 1 mile south of the approach end of runway 14, he was observing the Extra 300 and saw both airplanes nearing the runway. He noticed that the Cessna was in front and below the Extra 300 and estimated that the Cessna was at a low altitude of about 10-15 ft agl, while the Extra 300 was about 15-20 ft agl. He saw the two airplanes collide and fall onto the runway. He immediately notified the chief judge who then called 911. Both airplanes came to rest inverted, alongside each other, and off the right side of runway 14. A line of debris, from both airplanes, extended from the wreckage about 500 ft northwest. The left wing of the Cessna separated from the airplane at the root and was located about 100 ft north of the main wreckage. Both the left horizontal stabilizer and left elevator separated from the empennage. The left elevator exhibited multiple spanwise cuts, consistent with impacts from a sharp object. The wood and composite material propeller of the Extra 300 fractured into multiple pieces and was scattered throughout the debris field. The pilots of the Cessna exited their airplane and saw the pilot of the Extra 300 was out of his airplane and calling for assistance. According to the pilot of the Extra 300, he attempted to extricate the safety pilot until help arrived. Heat from a postaccident fire precluded rescue the effort. The airplanes were recovered to a secure facility for further examinations.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The NTSB's narrative for the Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300/LC preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record
On August 31, 2025, about 1040 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 172M, N61657, and an Extra Flugzeugproduktions-UND EA 300/LC, N330AN, were both destroyed when they collided midair near Fort Morgan, Colorado. The pilot and safety pilot of the Cessna received minor injuries. The pilot of the Extra 300 was seriously injured, and the safety pilot of the Extra 300 was fatally injured. Both airplanes were operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flights. According to the pilot of the Cessna, he was conducting instrument flight training with the assistance of a safety pilot. They were performing the RNAV GPS approach to runway 14 at Fort Morgan Municipal Airport (FMM) Fort Morgan, Colorado, while in visual flight rules (VFR) conditions. The pilot had made multiple radio calls on the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) to notify the FMM traffic of his arrival and was aware of aerobatic flights occurring at the airport. He recalled hearing two airplanes in the traffic pattern and understood that one may have landed. The pilot then continued the instrument approach to the decision altitude of 4,845 ft mean sea level, or about 250 ft above ground level (agl), then removed his view limiting device. He identified the runway and continued the approach visually. The pilot estimated that they were over the threshold when he heard a bang and felt a forward and downward acceleration. After the impact the two pilots immediately exited the airplane. According to the pilot of the Extra 300, he was competing in an aerobatic competition over the airport and completed his sequence. He exited the box and maneuvered to enter the traffic pattern at the traffic pattern altitude. He made multiple radio calls stating his intention to land on runway 14. He heard a previous competitor on the CTAF who would be landing before him, but no one else. While on the downwind leg, he entered a continuous left descending turn to the runway. He was on final approach and about ready to begin the flare when the Cessna appeared underneath the nose of the Extra 300. The impact happened quickly afterwards and there was no time for maneuvering or go around. According to a competition judge, located about 1 mile south of the approach end of runway 14, he was observing the Extra 300 and saw both airplanes nearing the runway. He noticed that the Cessna was in front and below the Extra 300 and estimated that the Cessna was at a low altitude of about 10-15 ft agl, while the Extra 300 was about 15-20 ft agl. He saw the two airplanes collide and fall onto the runway. He immediately notified the chief judge who then called 911. Both airplanes came to rest inverted, alongside each other, and off the right side of runway 14. A line of debris, from both airplanes, extended from the wreckage about 500 ft northwest. The left wing of the Cessna separated from the airplane at the root and was located about 100 ft north of the main wreckage. Both the left horizontal stabilizer and left elevator separated from the empennage. The left elevator exhibited multiple spanwise cuts, consistent with impacts from a sharp object. The wood and composite material propeller of the Extra 300 fractured into multiple pieces and was scattered throughout the debris field. The pilots of the Cessna exited their airplane and saw the pilot of the Extra 300 was out of his airplane and calling for assistance. According to the pilot of the Extra 300, he attempted to extricate the safety pilot until help arrived. Heat from a postaccident fire precluded rescue the effort. The airplanes were recovered to a secure facility for further examinations.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record for the Cessna 172M from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Midair collision during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
The aircraft
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Fire on the ground
- Operator: Bell Ornithopters Flying Club INC
The flight
- Departed from: BJC Denver CO at 3:55 am
- Flight plan: IFR
- Runway 14, 5,731 ft by 74 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
- Altimeter: 30.31 inHg
- Observation at 10:35 am from KFMM, 1 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KFMM 311635Z AUTO VRB05KT 10SM CLR 21/12 A3031 RMK AO2
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 2 |
The factual record for the Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300/LC from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Midair collision during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
The aircraft
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Flight plan: none
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
The NTSB has not released the docket for this case yet. The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), is usually released when the investigation is nearly complete, and the list here is refreshed when it appears. Check at the NTSB.
Connections how this case links to the rest of the register
- N61657 on the register today · the tail number may have moved to another aircraft since
- Cessna 172 Skyhawk 20,680 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Cessna 72,684 aircraft on the register
- N330AN: not on the register today · the record of its deregistration
- Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und EA 300 73 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Extra Flugzeugproduktions-Und 67 aircraft on the register
- Fort Morgan Municipal · nearest airport
- Rocky Mountain Metro Airport · departed from
- Accidents and incidents in Colorado 2,857 since 1982 · 381 in the last ten years
- Colorado 7,455 aircraft registered
The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR25FA268.json.
The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
