Bell 206B accident near El Centro, California, December 24, 2023
On December 24, 2023 at about 6:30 am local time, a 1975 Bell 206B (helicopter), registered N111PM, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near El Centro, California. It was an aerial application (crop spraying) flight under agricultural flying rules (Part 137). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
An in-flight failure of the engine-to-transmission driveshaft due to a fatigue fracture of the forward-most flex plate in the forward KAflex coupling that resulted from a loose bolt attachment between the flex plate and the forward driveshaft coupling. Contributing to the accident was maintenance personnel’s failure to identify the condition and remove the KAflex driveshaft for repair as specified by the manufacturer.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- December 24, 2023 · about 6:30 am local time
- Place
- El Centro, California · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Bell 206B, built 1975 · all 206Bs on the register
- Registration
- N111PM · registry record · serial 1770
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Aerial application (crop spraying) flight · agricultural flying rules (Part 137)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot was flying in night visual flight rules (VFR) conditions about 100 ft above ground level (agl), toward an intended application site for agricultural pesticides, when the helicopter began to make a loud noise and vibrate. Unsure if the helicopter had lost rotor rpm or not, the pilot lowered the collective and initiated a run-on landing to a field. Postaccident examination of the helicopter’s airframe and engine revealed that the forward-most flex plate of the forward flex coupling on the KAflex driveshaft assembly was fractured. No evidence of additional preaccident mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation was observed. Fracture analysis revealed that the flex plate failed due to a fatigue fracture resulting from a loose attachment between the flex plate and the forward driveshaft fitting. Multiple areas of missing or replacement torque paint were observed throughout the KAflex driveshaft assembly’s joints. It is likely that the joints had either slipped or been manually disturbed before the non-original torque paint was applied, which would have been cause for the driveshaft assembly to be removed and shipped to the manufacturer. However, no evidence of the driveshaft’s removal after visual confirmation of joint slippage or disturbance was recorded in the aircraft maintenance logs.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during enroute defining event
- Emergency descent initiated during enroute
- Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
The NTSB's findings
- Aircraft › Aircraft propeller/rotor › Main rotor drive › (general) › Failure
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Scheduled/routine inspection › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 8,119 hours in all; 616.2 in this make and model; 516 in the last 90 days; 178.9 in the last 30 days; 8,047 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: February 18, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 17,072.6 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, December 2, 2023
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Rolls Royce 250-C20J (turboshaft); 17,072 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: n/a Brawley CA at 2:00 am
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: night
- Wind: from 230° at 3 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 52°F (11°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
- Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
- Observation at 10:53 pm from KIPL, 2 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR KIPL 240653Z AUTO 23003KT 10SM CLR 11/09 A3003 RMK AO2 SLP168 T01060089=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
7 documents, released by the NTSB on October 22, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 6 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Airframe and Engine Exam Summary Report | PDF, 8 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Materials Laboratory Factual Report 24-047 | PDF, 8 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Maintenance Records | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Kamatics Service Instruction Number SIN2348 Rev K | PDF, 39 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Party Form Rolls-royce | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Other NTSB records under N111PM the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
