Compagnie Daher TB 30 EPSILON accident near Apache Junction, Arizona, June 10, 2023
On June 10, 2023 at about 2:51 pm local time, a 1988 Compagnie Daher TB 30 EPSILON, registered N759F, was destroyed in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Apache Junction, Arizona. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s controlled flight into the mountainous terrain due to diminished depth perception as a result of the shadowing effect from the sun’s position. Contributing to the accident was the decision by all three pilots to fly low altitude around the mountainous terrain.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 10, 2023 · about 2:51 pm local time
- Place
- Apache Junction, Arizona · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Compagnie Daher TB 30 EPSILON, built 1988 · all TB 30 EPSILONs on the register
- Registration
- N759F · registry record · serial 133
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The formation of three airplanes departed about 2 hrs and 20 minutes after sunrise to fly to an airport for lunch. The accident airplane was loaded with the pilot and a passenger, a full load of fuel, and an undetermined amount of baggage when they took off. The accident pilot, flying in the No. 2 position, intended to continue flying a solo cross-country after lunch. The flight planned to fly at low altitude around a local mountainous area en route to the lunch location. The No. 3 pilot reported that, during departure and before flying around the mountains, the accident airplane was having difficulty keeping up with the other two airplanes. Several witnesses observed the airplanes flying to the south along the west side of the mountains at a low altitude. They reported that the lead and No. 2 airplanes were close together, flying similar profiles, while the No. 3 airplane was further behind. Both pilots reported they struggled with depth perception when flying around the mountains. The No. 3 pilot reported that just before the accident, he observed the No. 2 airplane pass under his airplane from right to left toward the terrain. The nose of the airplane pitched up and down several times, but the trajectory of the airplane did not appear to change. He said the pilot of the No. 2 airplane did not make any radio calls or report any problems before the accident. A home security camera, facing east, captured the moment the No. 2 airplane impacted terrain. No airplanes were identifiable in the video. The video showed the west facing slopes of the mountains were shadowed and terrain features were not defined. It is possible the airplane was not performing as well as the other two airplanes due to its loading, but the evidence was insufficient to say whether that could have been a factor in the pilot’s ability to avoid the terrain. The evidence is consistent with the shadowing effects resulting from the positioning of the sun creating depth perception difficulties for the pilot. The pilot likely failed to recognize the significance of rising terrain in front of the airplane until there was insufficient time to avoid it, resulting in controlled flight into terrain. Contributing to the accident was the decision by all three pilots to fly at a low altitude around the mountainous terrain.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Low altitude operation/event during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot of other aircraft
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › (general) › Effect on personnel
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Mountainous/hilly terrain › Awareness of condition
- Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Mountainous/hilly terrain › Ability to respond/compensate
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; single-engine sea; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 575 hours in all; 250 in this make and model; 489 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: December 2, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 2
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 7,730.7 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, February 25, 2023
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine: Lycoming AEIO-540-L1B5 (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: FFZ Mesa AZ at 2:40 pm
- Destination: PAN Payson AZ
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 28°F (-2°C)
- Altimeter: 29.85 inHg
- Observation at 7:54 am from KFFZ, 15 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KFFZ 101454Z 00000KT 10SM CLR 26/M02 A2985 RMK AO2 SLP084 T02611022 51010
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
12 documents, released by the NTSB on April 24, 2025. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Records of Conversation - Formation Pilots | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Witness Statements | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 3 | ADS-B Data N315GC | spreadsheet | Download |
| 4 | ADS-B Data N130KL | spreadsheet | Download |
| 5 | Wreckage Examination Report | PDF, 12 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Pilot Flight Records | PDF, 28 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Maintenance Records | PDF, 10 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 9 | Solar Data | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 10 | Photos | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 11 | Security Video | MOV file | Download |
| 12 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 14 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR23FA223.
