Amateur-built LIGHTNING accident near Torrance, California, November 30, 2022
On November 30, 2022 at about 7:00 pm local time, a 2011 amateur-built LIGHTNING, registered N60MY, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern final) near Torrance, California (Zamperini Fld airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The failure of the pilot to maintain control of the airplane while performing a slip maneuver on final approach. Contributing was the failure of the pilot to fly a stabilized approach.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- November 30, 2022 · about 7:00 pm local time
- Place
- Torrance, California · Zamperini Fld · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built LIGHTNING, built 2011
- Registration
- N60MY · no longer on the register · serial 125
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
Two pilots were conducting pattern work at the accident airport. Video footage as well as witness statements showed the accident airplane was on final approach to land at a low altitude and high rate of speed. The airplane yawed to the left while in a forward slip, rolled inverted, and descended rapidly in a nose-down attitude. The airplane impacted terrain in a field just short of the runway threshold. Postaccident examination of the airplane’s wreckage revealed no evidence of any preimpact failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Overall, the medical investigation for this accident identified that both the pilot and pilot-rated passenger had potentially impairing medical conditions and had used potentially impairing substances. Although an improperly performed slip maneuver could explain the sudden loss of control, and such an improper maneuver might plausibly represent diminished performance related to subtle impairment, the investigation was unable to determine whether a medical factor contributed to the accident based on the available evidence. It is likely that the pilot’s control inputs were too aggressive when the airplane was placed into the forward slip to land, which resulted in the loss of control. Additionally, the pilot failed to fly a stabilized approach by landing too fast.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR pattern final) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 19,335 hours in all
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: unk
- Injury: fatal
Pilot-Rated Passenger
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 200 hours in all
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: unk
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Jabiru 3300 (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 11R, 3,000 ft by 75 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 100° at 9 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 2,000 ft
- Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
- Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
- Observation at 11:09 am from KTOA
Weather report (METAR): METAR KTOA 301909Z 10009KT 10SM BKN020 BKN030 17/12 A3005 RMK AIRPORT CLOSED DUE TO AN AIRCRAFT MISHAP
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
13 documents, released by the NTSB on December 5, 2024. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Memorandum for Record A�� Witnesses and Record of Email | PDF, 7 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 2 | ADS-B Data | data file · our copy | Download |
| 3 | Ops Vue Data | data file · our copy | Download |
| 4 | Info Provide for POH Excerpts | PDF, 2 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 5 | Airplane Flying Handbook Excerpts | PDF, 2 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 6 | Accident Site Summary Report | PDF, 6 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 7 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 8 | Toxicological Report Pilot Rated Passenger | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
| 9 | Medical Factual Memorandum for Record | PDF, 5 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 10 | Airframe and Engine Examination Summary Report | PDF, 6 pages · our copy | View Download |
| 11 | Video File Courtesy of Home Depot | AVI file · our copy | Download |
| 12 | Video File Courtesy of Torrance Memorial Medical Center | AVI file | Download |
| 13 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page · our copy | View Download |
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
