The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB WPR22LA192 · Final report

Maule MX-7-180C accident near Willits, California, May 30, 2022

On May 30, 2022 at about 3:40 pm local time, a 1997 Maule MX-7-180C, registered N1043B, was destroyed in an accident during approach (VFR go-around) near Willits, California (Priv airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

An uncommanded descent during a go-around maneuver for undetermined reasons.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
May 30, 2022 · about 3:40 pm local time
Place
Willits, California · Priv · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed and 1 person was seriously injured.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Maule MX-7-180C, built 1997 · all MX-7-180Cs on the register
Registration
N1043B · no longer on the register · serial 28003C
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot and passenger were landing at the 1,600-ft-long private dirt runway at the conclusion of a cross-country flight. The pilot told the passenger as they approached the runway that he may need to perform a go-around. The airplane landed hard about halfway down the runway and bounced, and the pilot added engine power to abort the landing. The airplane lifted off the ground near the end of the runway and transitioned into a climb. As the airplane crossed trees and continued toward rising terrain past the end of the runway, the passenger observed the pilot curse while pulling or rotating a knob which she identified as the throttle control. The airplane subsequently entered a left turn and began to descend nose-down. The passenger thought that the airplane may have leveled out, possibly in a left-wing-low attitude, before impact. Postaccident examination of the airplane and engine revealed no preimpact mechanical anomalies or malfunctions that could have precluded normal operation. Evidence revealed during the investigation suggests that the airplane’s uncommanded descent to the ground was either the result of an aerodynamic stall or excessive drag as the examination discovered that the flaps may have been in a fully deployed position at the time of the accident. However, there was no performance information on the airplane available or parametric data to determine if the airplane’s flight profile was consistent with an aerodynamic stall or whether the flap deployment contributed to the uncommanded descent. Based on these findings, the accident was result of an uncommanded descent during a go-around maneuver for undetermined reasons due to a lack of available evidence. Damage to the airplane was consistent with impact in an approximately level attitude. The wing flaps were found fully extended (48°), consistent with a landing position. Although the pilot had about 8,000 hours of helicopter flight experience, he had received his airplane single-engine land rating about two weeks before the accident and his flight experience in the accident airplane make and model was unknown. The circumstances of the accident suggest that the pilot likely failed to retract the flaps from the landing position during the attempted aborted landing, which resulted in a reduced climb performance. The pilot’s toxicology was positive for midazolam in his hospital blood and hydromorphone and fentanyl in his urine, which were likely administered after the accident. Thus, the medications detected in the pilot’s toxicology testing were not a factor.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during approach (VFR go-around) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not specified
  • Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 8,100 hours in all; 7,980 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 13, 2022
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 1,486 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, January 14, 2022
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,500 lb
  • Seats: 5
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming Engines O-360-C1F (piston); 1,486 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: 0Q9 Sonoma CA at 2:30 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 09/2, 1,600 ft by 50 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 37°F (3°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 8:56 am from KUKI, 22 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KUKI 301556Z AUTO VRB04KT 10SM CLR 14/03 A3000 RMK AO2 SLP154 T01440028

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers1

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR22LA192.