Amateur-built EARLY BIRD JENNY accident near Stoneville, North Carolina, May 27, 2021
On May 27, 2021 at about 10:35 pm local time, a 2017 amateur-built EARLY BIRD JENNY, registered N831HC, was destroyed in an accident during initial climb near Stoneville, North Carolina (Rockingham County Nc Shiloh airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack during the takeoff initial climb, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a loss of control.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- May 27, 2021 · about 10:35 pm local time
- Place
- Stoneville, North Carolina · Rockingham County Nc Shiloh · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built EARLY BIRD JENNY, built 2017
- Registration
- N831HC · registry record · serial 532
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The pilot, who was the co-owner/co-builder of the experimental amateur-built airplane, was departing on a local flight. The other co-owner/co-builder of the airplane witnessed the accident takeoff and stated that the airplane’s pitch attitude was “a little steep” and that the airplane looked slow as it approached 150 ft above ground level in the climb. Both the co-owner and another witness stated that the airplane’s wings were rocking before one wing dropped and the airplane entered a nose-down descent. The airplane impacted terrain about halfway down the 5,200-ft-long runway, and a postimpact fire ensued. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Review of the pilot’s logbook indicated that the accident flight was his third flight in the accident airplane and that he had recorded a total of 0.8 hours of flight experience. The co-owner stated that he and the accident pilot took turns flying the airplane and that the day of the accident was the warmest day on which they had flown the airplane. The co-owner had flown the airplane earlier on the day of the accident and stated that, although the airplane’s takeoff profile was “flatter than usual,” the airplane otherwise performed well and handled as expected. The co-owner also stated that neither he nor the accident pilot had conducted any aerodynamic stalls in the airplane, which was not equipped with a stall warning system. The extent to which the accident pilot had explored the airplane’s low-speed handling characteristics during flight could not be determined based on the available evidence for this accident. Review of the atmospheric conditions about the time of the accident indicated a density altitude of about 2,400 ft. Weight and balance documents for the airplane were not located, and the airplane’s weight and balance condition at the time of the accident was not determined. Autopsy and toxicology results for the pilot revealed evidence of an enlarged heart, anthracosis of the lungs, a carboxyhemoglobin saturation between 11% and 13%, and medications to treat high blood pressure. Minimal soot deposits were found in the trachea. Given the available evidence for this accident investigation, it is unlikely that the pilot’s cardiac condition was a factor in this accident. His carboxyhemoglobin saturation was not likely associated with impairment and was most likely the result of postcrash exposure to carbon monoxide. The circumstances of the accident are consistent with the pilot’s exceedance of the airplane’s critical angle of attack during takeoff, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall and a loss of control. It is likely that the density altitude conditions at the time of the accident degraded the airplane’s takeoff performance and that the pilot’s unfamiliarity with the airplane’s handling characteristics (especially in higher-density-altitude conditions) and with low speed/aerodynamic stalls contributed to his failure to recognize and correct the airplane’s angle of attack before the stall occurred.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during initial climb
- Aerodynamic stall/spin during initial climb defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Angle of attack › Not attained/maintained
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › High temperature › Response/compensation
- Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total experience w/ equipment › Pilot
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 755 hours in all; 1 in this make and model; 4 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 216 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: March 4, 2021
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: frt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 7.6 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, August 15, 2020
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Geo (piston); 0 hours total
- Fire on the ground
The flight
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 13/3, 5,200 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Sky: overcast at 9,500 ft
- Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
- Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
- Observation at 6:35 pm from KSIF
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
8 documents, released by the NTSB on June 8, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Witness Statements | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Pilot Logbook Excerpts | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Airplane Logbook | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Memorandum for Record - Wreckage Exam | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 5 | Medical Factual | PDF, 4 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 7 | Photo Array | PDF, 5 pages | View Download |
| 8 | Toxicological Report | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
