The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR20CA178 · Final report

Cessna 172 accident near Santa Barbara, California, June 9, 2020

On June 9, 2020 at about 6:45 pm local time, a 1976 Cessna 172, registered N75989, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Santa Barbara, California (Santa Barbara airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landing, which resulted in a runway excursion and collision with a fence.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 9, 2020 · about 6:45 pm local time
Place
Santa Barbara, California · Santa Barbara · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172 N, built 1976 · all 172s on the register
Registration
N75989 · no longer on the register · serial 17268089
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that during landing, the airplane bounced after touchdown. He applied full power to abort the landing and the airplane became airborne. The pilot then then changed his mind and landed the airplane on the remaining runway. After touching down the second time, the pilot was unable to maintain directional control and the airplane departed the runway surface and collided with a fence. The wing spar and empennage were substantially damaged. The pilot reported that there were no mechanical anomalies with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Student/instructed pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 160 hours in all; 160 in this make and model; 15 in the last 90 days; 12 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 10,276.2 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, June 8, 2020; 2 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,299 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-320 SERIES (piston); 2,552 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: CMA Camarillo CA at 5:47 pm
  • Destination: SBA Santa Barbara CA
  • Flight plan: VFR
  • Runway 15L, 4,180 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 230° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
  • Observation at 5:53 pm from KSBA

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

2 documents, released by the NTSB on October 9, 2020. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.