The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR11FA090 · Final report

Beech S35 accident near Chester, California, January 7, 2011

On January 7, 2011 at about 2:45 am local time, a Beech S35, registered N5866S, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach (VFR pattern crosswind) near Chester, California (Chester Rogers Field). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's loss of control while maneuvering to land, most likely due to spatial disorientation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 7, 2011 · about 2:45 am local time · cases in 2011
Place
Chester, California · Chester Rogers Field · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech S35 · all S35s on the register
Registration
N5866S · no longer on the register · serial D-7755
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The 76-year-old private pilot departed during the hours of darkness on a return trip to his home airport. Radar data revealed a flight track consistent with the pilot hand flying the airplane without the assistance of an autopilot at altitudes appropriate for the terrain elevation. No radar data was available for the approach segments and accident sequence of the flight. Based on witness reports, the airplane appeared to perform a normal crosswind approach over a town and toward the airport runway. During the airport approach, the pilot made a normal radio call and did not appear to be in distress. As the airplane rounded the turn from crosswind to downwind, it continued in a shallow, high-speed descent, directly into the frozen surface of a lake adjacent to the runway. The debris field was on a heading which approximated the downwind segment of the landing runway. The debris field length was consistent with a high-speed, right-wing-low, gradual descent into the ground. The landing gear and flaps were not in the landing configuration, and the speed brakes were not deployed. All sections of the airplane were located at the accident site, and no anomalies were noted with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. The damage to the propeller was consistent with the engine producing power at the time of impact. The airport was located on the outskirts of a town, adjacent to a lake and a sparsely populated national park. The moon, which exhibited a 6 percent visible disk, would have provided limited illumination and would have been located low on the horizon and behind the airplane during the crosswind and downwind turns. The pilot's forward view would also have been dominated by a dark void as the airplane passed over the town, and began the landing approach. The pilot did not possess an instrument rating, which, coupled with the lighting conditions, could have made him vulnerable to spatial disorientation. Additionally, the airplane's impact trajectory was consistent with him encountering this phenomena. The pilot had experienced a mild heart attack 6 years prior to the accident, with placement of stents in two coronary arteries, and a diagnosis of diabetes. He had denied any medical history in applications for FAA medical certificates. It was not possible to conclusively determine what role, if any, the pilot’s unreported medical conditions played in the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during approach (VFR pattern crosswind) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusio › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on personnel
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Health/Fitness › (general) › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Recent experience › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 2,700 hours in all; 467 in this make and model; 8 in the last 90 days; 5 in the last 30 days; 2,650 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: March 3, 2009
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,222 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 6, 2010; 5 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,300 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO 520 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: STS Santa Rosa CA at 1:45 am
  • Destination: O05 Chester CA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 34, 5,000 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 28°F (-2°C), dew point 21°F (-6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.25 inHg
  • Observation at 2:47 am from A488, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

29 documents, released by the NTSB on November 22, 2011. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Witness Statements PDF, 5 pages View Download
2 Onsite Airframe and Engine Examination PDF, 4 pages View Download
3 Follow-up Airframe and Engine Examination PDF, 5 pages View Download
4 FAA radar Data 1 text file View Download
5 FAA radar Data 2 text file View Download
6 Image 1: Flight Track Derived from FAA radar Data PDF, 1 page View Download
7 Image 2: Flight Track Derived from FAA radar Data PDF, 1 page View Download
8 Image 3: Flight Track with Altitudes and Time Stamps Derived from FAA radar Data PDF, 1 page View Download
9 Photo 1 - Overhead Photo Provided by Dan English PDF, 1 page View Download
10 Photo 2 - Debris Path PDF, 1 page View Download
11 Photo 3 - Propeller PDF, 1 page View Download
12 Photo 4 - Main Cabin PDF, 1 page View Download
13 Photo 5 - Engine PDF, 1 page View Download
14 Photo 6 - Landing Gear Gearbox PDF, 1 page View Download
15 Photo 7 - Airspeed Indicator PDF, 1 page View Download
16 Photo 8 - Right Wing Fragments PDF, 1 page View Download
17 Photo 9 - Speed Brake Paddle Witness Marks PDF, 1 page View Download
18 Photo 10 - Engine Crankshaft PDF, 1 page View Download
19 Photo 11 - Engine Spark Plugs PDF, 1 page View Download
20 Photo 12 - Elevator Trim Actuator PDF, 1 page View Download
21 Photo 13 - Left Flap Actuator PDF, 1 page View Download
22 Photo 14 - Right Flap Actuator PDF, 1 page View Download
23 Sun and Moon Position Data text file View Download
24 Westwood Station AT488 Remote Automated Weather Data text file View Download
25 Maintenance Logbook Excerpts PDF, 10 pages View Download
26 Pilot Logbook Excerpts PDF, 13 pages View Download
27 Release of Wreckage Form PDF, 1 page View Download
28 Toxicological Report PDF, 1 page View Download
29 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 2 pages View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR11FA090.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.