The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB WPR09CA126 · Final report

Ercoupe 415-E accident near Camas, Washington, February 19, 2009

On February 19, 2009 at about 8:30 pm local time, a Ercoupe 415-E, registered N94805, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Camas, Washington (Grove Field Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's misjudged landing flare and inadequate recovery from a bounced landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 19, 2009 · about 8:30 pm local time
Place
Camas, Washington · Grove Field Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Ercoupe 415-E · all 415-Es on the register
Registration
N94805 · registry record · serial 4918
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The purpose of the flight was for the student pilot to practice landings. While maneuvering on a normal traffic pattern to the runway, he noted that the airplane was higher and faster than he was accustomed to. The pilot recalled that he flared too high resulting in the airplane landing hard. Following the touchdown, the airplane bounced and landed hard again. The airplane sustained damage to the firewall. The pilot stated that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airframe or engine.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Hard landing during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Descent/approach/glide path › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Landing flare › Incorrect use/operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 33 hours in all; 33 in this make and model; 4 in the last 90 days; 1 in the last 30 days; 6 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,307 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 10, 2008; 10 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,400 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-200A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 1W1 Camas WA
  • Destination: 1W1 Camas WA
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 25, 2,710 ft by 40 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Visibility: 15 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 4,000 ft
  • Temperature: 50°F (10°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.