The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB SEA98LA132 · Final report

Amateur-built AA-5B accident near Chico Hot Sprgs, Montana, July 12, 1998

On July 12, 1998 at about 5:30 pm local time, a amateur-built AA-5B, registered N28299, was substantially damaged in an accident near Chico Hot Sprgs, Montana (Chico Hot Springs airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries; 3 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot-in-command's selection of the wrong runway for takeoff. Factors contributing to the accident were high density altitude, rising terrain and a fence post.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 12, 1998 · about 5:30 pm local time
Place
Chico Hot Sprgs, Montana · Chico Hot Springs · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries; 3 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Amateur-built AA-5B
Registration
N28299 · no longer on the register · serial AA5B0537
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot-in-command was briefed by the hotel operations manager that takeoffs to the south were 'not normally allowed,' but the pilot elected to depart to the south due to wind conditions. The manager then insured that the roadway serving as runway 14/32 was properly blocked off and manned. During the left turning crosswind climbout, the aircraft's left wing struck a fence. The aircraft then impacted terrain and came to rest. Terrain to the south and east was upsloping and higher than the takeoff runway elevation. The high elevation of the airstrip (5,280 feet) coupled with the warm ambient air temperature, created a high (7,784 foot) density altitude condition.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 319 hours in all; 126 in this make and model; 32 in the last 90 days; 16 in the last 30 days; 257 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,020 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, May 20, 1998; 60 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A4K (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Destination: BZN Bozeman MT
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 14, 6,000 ft by 35 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 21 knots, gusting 28
  • Visibility: 30 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.00 inHg
  • Observation at 5:54 pm from LVM, 23 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1
Passengers12

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N28299 the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1997-07-09LAX97LA236 · accident near Susanville, CA · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.