The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB SEA08CA107 · Final report

Cessna 152 accident near Tucson, Arizona, April 7, 2008

On April 7, 2008 at about 5:00 pm local time, a Cessna 152, registered N5259B, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Tucson, Arizona (Ryan Field). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's inadequate compensation for the gusty wind condition, which resulted in a loss of control and impact with terrain while landing. A contributing factor was the gusty wind condition.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 7, 2008 · about 5:00 pm local time
Place
Tucson, Arizona · Ryan Field · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 152 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N5259B · no longer on the register · serial 15283819
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The student pilot reported that he was practicing landings, and on the last landing the control tower reported a wind gust of 14 knots. The student pilot stated that after he landed "...the airplane went back in the air and I lost control." The airplane subsequently impacted the runway surface in a nose low, left wing down attitude, which resulted in substantial damage to the outboard 2 feet of the left wing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control in flight during landing defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing

The NTSB's findings

  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › Gusts › Not specified
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Crosswind correction › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Flight time: 101 hours in all; 101 in this make and model; 60 in the last 90 days; 22 in the last 30 days
  • Medical certificate: Class 2

The aircraft

  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RYN Tucson AZ
  • Destination: RYN Tucson AZ
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 24R, 4,900 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 270° at 9 knots, gusting 14
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 39°F (4°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
  • Observation at 6:00 pm from RYN

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N5259B the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1990-10-27SEA91LA010 · accident near Blackfoot, ID · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.