The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB OPS25LA048 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Embraer ERJ 170-200 LR incident near Monterey, California, July 15, 2025

On July 15, 2025 at about 7:05 am local time, a 2016 Embraer ERJ 170-200 LR, registered N185SY, was involved in an incident during approach near Monterey, California (Monterey Rgnl airport). It was flown under scheduled airline rules (Part 121). No one was hurt; 39 people were on board or involved. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this incident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 15, 2025 · about 7:05 am local time
Place
Monterey, California · Monterey Rgnl · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 39 people were on board or involved.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Embraer ERJ 170-200 LR, built 2016 · all ERJ 170-200 LRs on the register
Registration
N185SY · registry record · serial 17000600
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)

The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On July 15, 2025, about 0005 Pacific Daylight Time (PDT), SkyWest Airlines (SKW) flight 3005, an Embraer 170-200LR, N185SY, conducted a pilot-initiated go-around approximately 4 miles from the threshold of runway 10R at Monterey Regional Airport (MRY), Monterey, California due to the runway being closed. The flight departed from San Diego International Airport (SAN), San Diego, California about 2306 PDT. At the time of the go-around, MRY was closed by NOTAM Notice to Airmen between the hours of 0000 and 0500 PDT. Airport operations removed the lighted runway closure marker “X” from both ends of runway 10R and temporarily opened the runway for SKW3005 from 0015 until 0026 PDT. SKW3005 was vectored by the Northern California TRACON Terminal Radar Approach Control Facility. The facility’s 3-letter identifier is NCT however, it is often known as NORCAL, which is what it will be referred to in this report. for another approach to runway 10R. The flight landed uneventfully about 0025. There were no injuries among the 2 flight crewmembers, 2 cabin crewmembers, and 35 passengers who deplaned at the gate. The flight was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 scheduled domestic passenger flight. History of Flight The flight release for the event flight, titled “final release,” was completed by the SkyWest dispatcher at 2152. The release indicated an estimated time of arrival as 0018. In a statement provided by the dispatcher, they stated that they “reviewed NOTAMs for the airport and noted that the original scheduled times would result in the flight’s arrival before the scheduled closure time. However, the ETD [estimated time of departure] was then delayed by approximately 20 minutes….this pushed the arrival time past the airport closure time.” The dispatcher, after sending the release, passed the flight to their relief, or pass down, dispatcher. The pass down dispatcher stated that the only things that were remarked were “30 minutes of hold for poor weather in the area” and what the alternate was. The pass down dispatcher had no contact with the flight prior to departure. According to ADSB Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast data, flight 3005 pushed back from the gate at SAN about 2250, which was a delay from its scheduled departure time of 2159. The flight taxied to runway 27 and began the departure roll about 2306. According to the captain, while enroute they began reviewing the NOTAMs for MRY. He stated “upon seeing a NOTAM indicating the airport would be closed, I mentioned to the FO that it couldn’t be possible we were arriving into a closed airport, especially given we hadn’t received any communication or advisories from dispatch…” About 2305 the MRY airport operations manager received a voicemail from the airline regarding flight 3005, requesting a delay in the airport’s scheduled closure to accommodate the arrival of flight 3005. However, there was no confirmation returned that the closure would be delayed. About 2341 the flight began to descend into MRY for an approach and landing. The flight contacted NORCAL and stated they were descending from 16,000 ft to 10,000 ft with “the weather and NOTAMs for Monterey.” The NORCAL controller acknowledged their transmission and asked what approach they would like, to which the flight crew responded, “the ILS (instrument landing system) to 10R,” which the controller acknowledged. Figure 1: ILS Runway 10R Approach (Source: Jeppesen) According to airport operations personnel, at 2359 an announcement was made over the common traffic advisory frequency (CTAF) frequency stating that they were beginning the airport closure. About 0001 the flight was cleared by NORCAL for an ILS approach to runway 10R at MRY. Subsequently, the flight crew switched frequency to the CTAF at MRY to announce their intention to land. About 0003, airport operations personnel placed and raised a lighted “X” at each end of runway 10R. About the same time, airport ground personnel heard flight 3005 announce on the CTAF that they were on a 5-mile final. The flight descended via the ILS to approximately 1,300 ft above mean sea level (msl) and then initiated a missed approach maneuver about 0004. Prior to executing the missed approach, the airport operations manager, who was monitoring the CTAF, advised the crew that the airport was closed. According to the FO, the individual on the CTAF stated that they would “pull the X” to allow the flight to land. The flight crew continued the published missed approach procedure, contacted NORCAL, and stated they were flying the published missed approach due to the runway being closed. Audio recording provided by the FAA indicated that when the flight crew contacted NORCAL on the missed approach and explained the reason for the missed approach, the air traffic controller stated, “… news to me.” The NORCAL controller subsequently stated, “This is a big surprise to what you are saying, and we are trying to figure out on our side what is going on.” The flight crew confirmed they had adequate fuel to attempt another approach and, if necessary, be able to divert to the flight’s filed alternate airport. NORCAL vectored the flight to an approximate 20 mile final. According to the captain “NORCAL advised that they would not clear us for the approach unless we received positive verbal confirmation that the runway was open.” As the flight approached the final approach fix, the MRY ground crew personnel reported that the “runway was open.” The crew informed the NORCAL controller, who vectored the flight to intercept the approach to MRY. During the second approach, the flight’s dispatcher sent an ACARS Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System message asking the crew for their intentions. The captain asked the FO to respond with “Landing MRY. Standby.” The flight subsequently landed on runway 10R about 0025, exited the runway at taxiway “L,” and taxied to the gate uneventfully. Figure 2: SkyWest Flight 3005 Approach to MRY (Source: ADSBexchange.com) A review of the NOTAMs for MRY revealed that there were ten NOTAMs in effect at the time of the incident. One of the NOTAMs specified that the MRY airport was closed Tuesday through Saturday from July 8, 2025, until August 9, 2025, from 0000-0500 PDT. The incident flight occurred on Tuesday. Airport Information MRY was located about 3 miles to the southeast of Monterey, California at an elevation of 256.6 ft msl. The airport has two paved landing surfaces, 10R/28L and 10L/28R. Runway 10R/28L was 7,175 ft long and 150 ft wide. Runway 10L/28R was “not available for air carrier use. Source: https://aeronav.faa.gov/afd/12jun2025/sw_216_12JUN2025.pdf ” The MRY air traffic control tower (ATCT) operated daily from 0700 until 2200. At the time of the incident, the ATCT was closed and was not providing services. NOT FOR NAVIGATION Figure 3: MRY Airport Diagram (Source: Jeppesen)

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Unknown or undetermined during approach defining event
  2. Preflight or dispatch event during prior to flight
  3. Air traffic event during approach
  4. Navigation error during approach

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme
  • Seats: 80
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Operator: Skywest Airlines INC

The flight

  • Departed from: SAN San Diego CA at 5:50 am
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 10R/, 7,175 ft by 150 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 280° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 300 ft
  • Temperature: 55°F (13°C), dew point 54°F (12°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.94 inHg
  • Observation at 11:54 pm from KMRY

Weather report (METAR): KMRY 150654Z AUTO 28003KT 10SM OVC003 13/12 A2994 RMK AO2 SLP151 T01280117

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Cabi2
Flig2
Passengers35

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number OPS25LA048.