The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB OPS25LA032 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Airbus A319-114 and Northrop T38 incident near Arlington, Virginia, March 28, 2025

On March 28, 2025 at about 7:15 pm local time, 2 aircraft, Airbus A319-114 (N342NB) and Northrop T38 (DRAGO61), were involved in the same incident near Arlington, Virginia. No one was hurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this incident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
March 28, 2025 · about 7:15 pm local time
Place
Arlington, Virginia · map
Type
Incident
Injuries
No one was hurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft 1
Airbus A319-114, built 2002 · all A319-114s on the register
Registration
N342NB · registry record · serial 1746
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight of an unrecorded kind · scheduled airline rules (Part 121)
Aircraft 2
Northrop T38 · all T38s on the register
Registration
DRAGO61 · no longer on the register · serial 6714833
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Flight · military rules

The NTSB's narrative for the Airbus A319-114 preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On March 28, 2025, about 1516 eastern daylight time (EDT), DRAGO61, a flight of four US Air Force Northrop T38s, enroute to conduct an aerial flyby at Arlington National Cemetery, and Delta (DAL) Air Lines flight 2983 (DAL2983), an Airbus 319-114, N342NB, departing Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA), Arlington, Virginia, were involved in a loss of separation approximately 0.6 miles south of DCA. DRAGO61 was operating as a title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 military flight, and DAL2983 was operating under title 14 CFR part 121 scheduled passenger flight. There were no injuries and no damage to any of the aircraft involved. The Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Traffic Control Tower (DCA ATCT) Air Traffic Manager (ATM) stated that at the time of the incident, the traffic volume was moderate with moderate complexity. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the incident. The weather at the time of the incident was visual flight rules (VFR) with the following conditions being reported: Wind from 180 at 6 knots, visibility 10 miles with an overcast ceiling at 11,000 feet. Showers were in the vicinity to the Northeast. At the time of the event there were 8 certified professional controllers (CPCs) and 1 CPC in-training (IT) on duty. There were 6 positions open. There were 6 CPCs and 1 controller in-charge (CIC) on position. 2 CPCs and 1 CPC-IT were available. Due to staffing constraints, the only Operations Supervisor (OS) that was scheduled to work that day had already completed their assigned shift and a CIC was providing general oversight at the time of the event. The Potomac Consolidated Terminal Radar Approach Control (PCT TRACON), DEALE radar sector was providing air traffic services to DRAGO61 when the loss of separation occurred. In the PCT TRACON Mount Vernon area at the time of the event, there were 15 CPCs and 1 OS on duty. There were 8 positions open with 7 CPCs and 1 OS on position. There were 4 CPCs available with 4 CPCs on other duties. A review of air traffic control (ATC) audio recordings provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) indicated that at about 1441:25 EDT, the PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC to verify that they knew about the DRAGO61 flyover. The CIC acknowledged and stated that they were waiting for a “stop the departures time.” The PCT TRACON OS stated that the Time on Target (TOT) would be at 1521 EDT and the stop time would be 17. The PCT OS stated that if it changed, they would call back. CIC acknowledged TOT 21 and stop around 17 but the OS would call back with official time. The OS acknowledged. 1502:11 The DEALE sector radar position was opened for the flyby. 1502:32 DRAGO61 checked in with the DEALE radar controller while a position relief briefing was in progress. 1502:40 The DEALE position relief briefing concluded. 1502:45 DRAGO61 requested an updated TOT, and the DEALE controller provided an updated TOT of 1515. DRAGO61 acknowledged. 1512:15 The LC controller cleared the first uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1512:45 The PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC with “stop all departures hard time is now seventeen.” The CIC responded, “hard time seventeen we will stop all departures.” 1513:04 The LC controller cleared a second uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1514:17 The DEALE controller issues DRAGO61 traffic information and control instructions regarding the first uninvolved departure. 1514:20 The LC controller cleared a third uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1514:55 The DEALE controller issues DRAGO61 traffic information and control instructions regarding the first and second uninvolved departures. 1515:00 The LC controller cleared DAL2983 for takeoff on runway 19 with instructions to fly runway heading. 1515:22 The PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC and asked why they were departing aircraft. The CIC stated, “hard stop is seventeen, right?” OS responded that the instruction was to stop departures and that the hard time was seventeen. The CIC stated that there was one departure on departure roll. The OS said “stop”, and the CIC replied that the aircraft could not stop. The DEALE controller advised DRAGO61 of the third uninvolved departure and issued control instructions. 1515:34 DRAGO61 replied looking for traffic. 1515:37 The DEALE controller reissued traffic information to DRAGO61. 1515:47 DRAGO61 reported traffic in sight and advised that they were below the traffic. 1515:48 The DEALE controller instructed DRAGO61 to resume their own navigation and to proceed inbound. DRAGO61 acknowledged. 1516:00 The LC controller instructed DAL2983 to contact departure. 1516:04 The LC attempted to contact DAL2983 to advise them of the DRAGO61 flight but DAL2983 did not respond. 1516:15 The DEALE controller asked DRAGO61 if they had the additional traffic [DAL2983] departing DCA in sight. 1516:19 DRAGO61 reported the traffic in sight. 1516:23 The DEALE controller instructed DRAGO61 to maintain visual separation with the traffic, instructed them to climb to 5,000 feet and fly heading 270° when able. DRAGO61 acknowledged. After the event, the LC controller called the PCT TRACON KRANT sector radar controller to figure out where the confusion had occurred. They advised the KRANT controller that they were instructed to stop at seventeen, but the KRANT controller said seventeen was the hard time. Figure 1 is an overhead view of the incident flight tracks overlaid onto satellite imagery in Google Earth. The DAL2983 flight track is illustrated in yellow and DRAGO61 flight track in orange. The DCA airport is labeled, and arrows have been added to show the direction of travel. Figure 1. Overhead view of the flight tracks for DAL2983 and DRAGO61 – Closest proximity .64 nm / 100 ft. Upon notification, the NTSB formed an ATC investigative group and parties to the investigation include the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), and the United States Air Force. Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) data, audio recordings, and other pertinent data and documentation were obtained from the FAA. These data are currently being analyzed by the NTSB. During the week of March 30th, 2025, the ATC investigative group conducted an on-site investigation and interviewed personnel at both DCA ATCT and PCT TRACON, the ATC facilities that were providing services to DAL2983 and DRAGO61 at the time of the incident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The NTSB's narrative for the Northrop T38 preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record

On March 28, 2025, about 1516 eastern daylight time (EDT), DRAGO61, a flight of four US Air Force Northrop T38s, enroute to conduct an aerial flyby at Arlington National Cemetery, and Delta (DAL) Air Lines flight 2983 (DAL2983), an Airbus 319-114, N342NB, departing Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA), Arlington, Virginia, were involved in a loss of separation approximately 0.6 miles south of DCA. DRAGO61 was operating as a title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 91 military flight, and DAL2983 was operating under title 14 CFR part 121 scheduled passenger flight. There were no injuries and no damage to any of the aircraft involved. The Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Traffic Control Tower (DCA ATCT) Air Traffic Manager (ATM) stated that at the time of the incident, the traffic volume was moderate with moderate complexity. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the incident. The weather at the time of the incident was visual flight rules (VFR) with the following conditions being reported: Wind from 180 at 6 knots, visibility 10 miles with an overcast ceiling at 11,000 feet. Showers were in the vicinity to the Northeast. At the time of the event there were 8 certified professional controllers (CPCs) and 1 CPC in-training (IT) on duty. There were 6 positions open. There were 6 CPCs and 1 controller in-charge (CIC) on position. 2 CPCs and 1 CPC-IT were available. Due to staffing constraints, the only Operations Supervisor (OS) that was scheduled to work that day had already completed their assigned shift and a CIC was providing general oversight at the time of the event. The Potomac Consolidated Terminal Radar Approach Control (PCT TRACON), DEALE radar sector was providing air traffic services to DRAGO61 when the loss of separation occurred. In the PCT TRACON Mount Vernon area at the time of the event, there were 15 CPCs and 1 OS on duty. There were 8 positions open with 7 CPCs and 1 OS on position. There were 4 CPCs available with 4 CPCs on other duties. A review of air traffic control (ATC) audio recordings provided by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) indicated that at about 1441:25 EDT, the PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC to verify that they knew about the DRAGO61 flyover. The CIC acknowledged and stated that they were waiting for a “stop the departures time.” The PCT TRACON OS stated that the Time on Target (TOT) would be at 1521 EDT and the stop time would be 17. The PCT OS stated that if it changed, they would call back. CIC acknowledged TOT 21 and stop around 17 but the OS would call back with official time. The OS acknowledged. 1502:11 The DEALE sector radar position was opened for the flyby. 1502:32 DRAGO61 checked in with the DEALE radar controller while a position relief briefing was in progress. 1502:40 The DEALE position relief briefing concluded. 1502:45 DRAGO61 requested an updated TOT, and the DEALE controller provided an updated TOT of 1515. DRAGO61 acknowledged. 1512:15 The LC controller cleared the first uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1512:45 The PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC with “stop all departures hard time is now seventeen.” The CIC responded, “hard time seventeen we will stop all departures.” 1513:04 The LC controller cleared a second uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1514:17 The DEALE controller issues DRAGO61 traffic information and control instructions regarding the first uninvolved departure. 1514:20 The LC controller cleared a third uninvolved aircraft for takeoff from runway 19. 1514:55 The DEALE controller issues DRAGO61 traffic information and control instructions regarding the first and second uninvolved departures. 1515:00 The LC controller cleared DAL2983 for takeoff on runway 19 with instructions to fly runway heading. 1515:22 The PCT TRACON OS called the DCA ATCT CIC and asked why they were departing aircraft. The CIC stated, “hard stop is seventeen, right?” OS responded that the instruction was to stop departures and that the hard time was seventeen. The CIC stated that there was one departure on departure roll. The OS said “stop”, and the CIC replied that the aircraft could not stop. The DEALE controller advised DRAGO61 of the third uninvolved departure and issued control instructions. 1515:34 DRAGO61 replied looking for traffic. 1515:37 The DEALE controller reissued traffic information to DRAGO61. 1515:47 DRAGO61 reported traffic in sight and advised that they were below the traffic. 1515:48 The DEALE controller instructed DRAGO61 to resume their own navigation and to proceed inbound. DRAGO61 acknowledged. 1516:00 The LC controller instructed DAL2983 to contact departure. 1516:04 The LC attempted to contact DAL2983 to advise them of the DRAGO61 flight but DAL2983 did not respond. 1516:15 The DEALE controller asked DRAGO61 if they had the additional traffic [DAL2983] departing DCA in sight. 1516:19 DRAGO61 reported the traffic in sight. 1516:23 The DEALE controller instructed DRAGO61 to maintain visual separation with the traffic, instructed them to climb to 5,000 feet and fly heading 270° when able. DRAGO61 acknowledged. After the event, the LC controller called the PCT TRACON KRANT sector radar controller to figure out where the confusion had occurred. They advised the KRANT controller that they were instructed to stop at seventeen, but the KRANT controller said seventeen was the hard time. Figure 1 is an overhead view of the incident flight tracks overlaid onto satellite imagery in Google Earth. The DAL2983 flight track is illustrated in yellow and DRAGO61 flight track in orange. The DCA airport is labeled, and arrows have been added to show the direction of travel. Figure 1. Overhead view of the flight tracks for DAL2983 and DRAGO61 – Closest proximity .64 nm / 100 ft. Upon notification, the NTSB formed an ATC investigative group and parties to the investigation include the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), and the United States Air Force. Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) data, audio recordings, and other pertinent data and documentation were obtained from the FAA. These data are currently being analyzed by the NTSB. During the week of March 30th, 2025, the ATC investigative group conducted an on-site investigation and interviewed personnel at both DCA ATCT and PCT TRACON, the ATC facilities that were providing services to DAL2983 and DRAGO61 at the time of the incident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record for the Airbus A319-114 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Air traffic event during initial climb defining event

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 145
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Operator: Delta Air Lines INC

The flight

  • Destination: MSP Minneapolis MN
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 180° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 11,000 ft; clear
  • Temperature: 70°F (21°C), dew point 39°F (4°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.12 inHg
  • Observation at 2:52 pm from KDCA, 1 miles away

Weather report (METAR): KDCA 281852Z 18006KT 10SM OVC110 21/04 A3012 RMK AO2 SLP200 VCSH NE T02060044

The factual record for the Northrop T38 from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Near midair/TCAS alert/loss of separation during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Operator: US Air Force

The flight

  • Departed from: LFI Hampton VA
  • Destination: LFI Hampton VA
  • Flight plan: VFR then IFR

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number OPS25LA032.