The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB IAD02LA012 · Final report

Cessna 152 accident near Corning, New York, November 10, 2001

On November 10, 2001 at about 10:00 pm local time, a Cessna 152, registered N5195B, was substantially damaged in an accident near Corning, New York (Corning-Painted Post Airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The CFI's delayed remedial action, which resulted in a loss of control during landing rollout and impact with a parked airplane.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 10, 2001 · about 10:00 pm local time
Place
Corning, New York · Corning-Painted Post Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 152 · all 152s on the register
Registration
N5195B · no longer on the register · serial 15283800
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The Cessna 152 landed on runway 31, and the CFI planned for a "long rollout" so the student could practice taxiing. During the rollout, the student pressed the left brake, and the airplane veered off the left side of the runway. The CFI attempted to counteract the turn with right rudder and brake pressure, but was unable to avoid a parked Cessna. The Cessna 152 then rotated to the left, its propeller sliced through the empennage of the Cessna 172, and it came to a stop. The CFI stated that there were no mechanical malfunctions with the airplane, and he "did not catch his student's actions in time."

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,358 hours in all; 608 in this make and model; 48 in the last 90 days; 22 in the last 30 days; 2,201 as pilot in command; 1,393 on instruments
  • Last flight review: January 12, 2001
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (valid medical--no waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 5,385 hours
  • Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, August 15, 2001; 28 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,670 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-235 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 7N1 Corning NY at 9:00 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 31, 3,010 ft by 102 ft
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 240° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 48°F (9°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.76 inHg
  • Observation at 9:53 pm from ELM, 10 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.