Cessna 182S accident near Naples, Florida, June 20, 2026
On June 20, 2026 at about 2:30 pm local time, a 1999 Cessna 182S, registered N7270H, was substantially damaged in an accident during takeoff (rejected takeoff) near Naples, Florida (Wing South Airpark airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- June 20, 2026 · about 2:30 pm local time
- Place
- Naples, Florida · Wing South Airpark · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Cessna 182S, built 1999 · all 182Ss on the register
- Registration
- N7270H · registry record · serial 18280481
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative preliminary · quoted from the NTSB record
On June 20, 2026 at 1030 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 182S, N7270H, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Naples, Florida. The pilot and three passengers were uninjured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he planned to take three friends on a cross-country flight from Wing South Airport (FA37), Naples, Florida to Marathon International Airport (MTH), Marathon, Florida. He also reported it was his first flight of the day. Upon arrival at the departure airport, he conducted a preflight inspection of the airplane and did not find anything concerning. He reported that he received a weather briefing from flight service the night before the flight, then received an updated briefing the following morning. He remarked that it had been “hot that day” and that there were wet conditions at the airport. After the passengers boarded, he started the engine and taxied to runway 18 at FA37. Before departure, he conducted an engine runup and noted that all systems were operating normally. The pilot stated that he then conducted a normal takeoff, with the wing flaps retracted. The pilot reported that during the takeoff roll he observed normal engine indications on the tachometer, manifold pressure, and other engine gauges. He stated that he rotated the airplane at 70 to 75 knots, and that “upon liftoff, the aircraft felt sluggish, and the stall warning horn activated.” The pilot felt that the airplane was not producing sufficient power to climb, but stated “there were no abnormal sounds or instrument indications.” He then lowered the nose to accelerate. A review of airport security camera footage showed that the airplane about came into view when it was about 1,800 ft from the approach end of runway 18, airborne and aligned with runway. The airplane remained at a low altitude above the runway and eventually exited the frame of the security camera. The pilot then determined he did not have adequate airspeed to climb and decided to abort the takeoff. He landed on the remaining runway, and estimated there was 100 to 200 ft of runway remaining after he had touched down. The pilot stated the runway was damp and he did not apply heavy braking as he was concerned the wheels could lock up. The airplane then exited the runway onto grass on the departure end of runway 18. The pilot noticed an approaching concrete wall and decided to turn to the right. He then struck the concrete wall with airplane’s left wing. Post-accident examination of the airplane by an FAA inspector revealed substantial damage to the airplane’s left wing. Fuel was found in both wings and at the fuel strainer. The fuel was clear and blue, without any visible contaminants. The airplane’s engine was recovered and retained for further examination.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Runway excursion during takeoff (rejected takeoff) defining event
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 4,944.6 hours
- Last inspection: 100-hour inspection, June 11, 2026; 7 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,100 lb
- Seats: 4
- Landing gear: fixed
- Operator: Sundowners Inc.
The flight
- Departed from: FA37 Naples FL at 6:30 pm
- Destination: MTH Marathon FL
- Flight plan: none
- Runway 18, 4,400 ft by 100 ft
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 240° at 6 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: broken clouds at 2,800 ft
- Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 75°F (24°C)
- Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
- Observation at 10:30 am from MKY, 7 miles away
Weather report (METAR): SPECI KMKY 201430Z AUTO 24006KT 10SM BKN028 BKN037 BKN043 32/24 A3004 RMK AO2 PNO $
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flig | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 3 |
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA26LA244.
