The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA26LA236 · Final report

Cub Crafters INC CC19-215 accident near Plymouth, New Hampshire, June 9, 2026

On June 9, 2026 at about 8:04 pm local time, a 2022 Cub Crafters INC CC19-215, registered N69NX, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Plymouth, New Hampshire (Plymouth Muni airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to maintain control of the airplane during an aborted landing attempt which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 9, 2026 · about 8:04 pm local time · cases in 2026
Place
Plymouth, New Hampshire · Plymouth Muni · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cub Crafters INC CC19-215, built 2022 · all CC19-215s on the register
Registration
N69NX · registry record · serial CC19-0069
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot and the pilot-rated passenger were on a personal cross-country flight and upon reaching their destination, the pilot wanted to perform some practice landings. During the first landing attempt, she was too high on approach and performed a go-around. During the second attempt, the pilot stated that while attempting to land, after touchdown, the airplane turned to the right. She used left brake and rudder to attempt to regain directional control and applied engine power to abort the landing. Several eyewitnesses reported that the airplane appeared to bounce twice after landing, after which they heard the engine power up before the left wing dropped, impacted the turf runway, and “tumbled” before the airplane came to rest. The impact resulted in substantial damage to the left wing and fuselage. Postaccident examination of the airplane’s flight controls revealed no evidence of any preimpact failures or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Given this information, it is likely that during the aborted landing attempt, the airplane exceeded the critical angle of attack resulting in an aerodynamic stall.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing (aborted after touchdown)
  2. Loss of control in flight during landing defining event
  3. Abnormal runway contact during landing (aborted after touchdown)

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Not attained/maintained

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 967 hours in all; 660 in this make and model; 293 in the last 90 days; 175 in the last 30 days; 824 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: minor injuries

Pilot-Rated Passenger

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: frt
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 516.4 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 1, 2026
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,300 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-390 (piston); 0 hours total
  • Operator: Sonoma Valley LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: 0B5 Montague MA at 6:30 pm
  • Runway 12/3, 2,347 ft by 90 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 280° at 8 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 84°F (29°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.99 inHg
  • Observation at 4:00 pm from 1P1

Weather report (METAR): METAR K1P1 091955Z AUTO 28008KT 10SM CLR 29/09 A2999 RMK AO2 T02860091

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Photographs from the investigation 3 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

5 documents, released by the NTSB on August 27, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ERA26LA236.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.