The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ERA26LA113 · Final report

Cessna 320C accident near Bartow, Florida, February 9, 2026

On February 9, 2026 at about 9:21 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 320C, registered N3034T, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Bartow, Florida (Bartow Executive Airport). It was a flight test under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

Maintenance personnel’s failure to perform an adequate inspection of the airplane’s landing gear, which resulted in a collapse of the left main landing gear during landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 9, 2026 · about 9:21 pm local time · cases in 2026
Place
Bartow, Florida · Bartow Executive Airport · cases near this airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 320C, built 1965 · all 320Cs on the register
Registration
N3034T · registry record · serial 320C0034
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight test · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During a post-maintenance flight following the completion of an annual inspection, the pilot/ mechanic reported that the preflight inspection, engine run-up, and landing gear retraction after takeoff revealed no anomalies. While on approach to land, the pilot selected the landing gear down and observed that the geardown indicator light did not illuminate. He cycled the landing gear and subsequently performed a low approach; air traffic control personnel reported that the landing gear appeared to be extended. The pilot remained in the traffic pattern and attempted a manual gear extension, but the indication anomaly persisted. He again cycled the landing gear and verified circuit breaker continuity with no change noted. After a second low approach, the pilot elected to land. During the landing roll, as the airplane decelerated and the pilot initiated a right turn to exit the runway, the left main landing gear collapsed. The airplane’s left wing and left horizontal stabilizer contacted the runway surface, resulting in substantial damage. The pilot/mechanic stated that during the annual inspection, there were no adjustments made to the landing gear rigging and the gear was cycled several times with no anomalies noted. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the left main gear intermediate push-pull tube was deformed, and the side brace lock link was misrigged. The left hydraulic brake hose was misrouted and not clamped in position. Both main gear side brace lock link springs were corroded and the right main gear downlock tension was below the manufacture’s minimum limits. According to the airplane’s maintenance manual, the landing gear operational and rigging checks are to be performed every 12 months or 100 hours. Based on this information, the inspection of the landing gear that was completed by the maintenance personnel likely was not sufficient to detect and correct these discrepancies before they resulted in the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)
  2. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during approach defining event
  3. Aircraft inspection event during prior to flight

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Gear extension and retract sys › Inadequate inspection other cases naming the landing gear
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Scheduled/routine inspection › Maintenance personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Medical certificate: Class 2
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 3,429.6 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, February 9, 2026; 0.6 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 5,200 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Continental TSIO-470-D (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Continental TSIO-470-D (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 27R, 5,000 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 310° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 77°F (25°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.20 inHg
  • Observation at 4:20 pm from BOW

Weather report (METAR): METAR KBOW 092120Z AUTO 31005KT 10SM CLR 25/02 A3020 RMK AO2 PWINO

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Photographs from the investigation 4 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them

The NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

7 documents, released by the NTSB on July 15, 2026. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Connections how this case links to the rest of the register

Aircraft
Place

The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ERA26LA113.json.

The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.